Beebread pollen composition is affected by seasonality and landscape structure
Authors:
- Gherardo BogoGherardo Bogo
- Sergio AlbertazziSergio Albertazzi
- Vittorio CapanoVittorio Capano
- Valeria CaringiVCValeria Caringi
- Francesca CorvucciFCFrancesca Corvucci
- Amanda DettoriADAmanda Dettori
- Manuela GiovanettiManuela Giovanetti
- Francesca-Vittoria GrillenzoniFGFrancesca-Vittoria Grillenzoni
- Irene GuerraIrene Guerra
- Carolina VittiCarolina Vitti
- Piotr MedrzyckiPiotr Medrzycki
- Laura BortolottiLaura Bortolotti
- 13 February 2025
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
- Vol. 197 (3) , 284
Abstract
In honey bee diet, pollen is the primary source of proteins and essential nutrients. High pollen diversity and protein content support honey bee health, enhancing resistance to different stressors. Agroecosystem simplification, with few dominant species flowering for a limited period, can lead to a shortage of forage and a reduction in the variety and quantity of food. We therefore investigated how agroecosystem landscape characteristics influence pollen collection patterns. We collected beebread from 25 apiaries, located in Emilia-Romagna (Northeastern Italy), in March and June 2021 and 2022. We evaluated their pollen diversity and protein content and assessed the relationship with landscape heterogeneity and composition in a 1500 m radius around each apiary. A total of 138 pollen taxa were identified, predominantly from the Fabaceae, Rosaceae, and Asteraceae families. Pollen richness was significantly higher in June than in March for both years. Protein content, on the other hand, was higher in 2021 compared to 2022 and, for 2022 only, in June compared to March. Cluster analysis of the 25 sites according to their landscape characteristics revealed three distinct groups: Group 1 (mainly arable land), Group 2 (mixed arable land and forest), and Group 3 (arable land and permanent crops). Group 1 had lower landscape heterogeneity. Pollen composition did not differ significantly among groups, suggesting that honey bees might expand their foraging area (over the 1500 m radius that we consider) in response to landscape homogeneity, as observed in Group 1 areas. On the other hand, pollen diversity was highest in Group 3, likely due to the variety of fruit tree species and spontaneous flora.Keywords
Funding Information
- Italian Ministry of Agriculture, Food Sovereignty and Forestry
This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- How seasonality, semi-natural habitat cover and compositional landscape heterogeneity affect pollen collection and development of Apis mellifera colonies in Mediterranean agro-sylvo-pastoral systemsLandscape Ecology, 2024
- Spontaneous flowering vegetation favours hoverflies and parasitoid wasps in apple orchards but has low cascading effects on biological pest controlAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2023
- Honey bee foraged pollen reveals temporal changes in pollen protein content and changes in forager choice for abundant versus high protein flowersAgriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021
- Pollen and Chemical Content of Beebreads from Serpentine Areas in Albania and BulgariaBiological Trace Element Research, 2021
- Agricultural practices and quality of environment: evidence for global perspectiveEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research, 2019
- Pollen load diversity and foraging niche overlap in a pollinator community of the rare Dictamnus albus L.Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 2017
- Seasonal trends in honey bee pollen foraging revealed through DNA barcoding of bee-collected pollenInsectes Sociaux, 2017
- Anthropogenic drivers of plant diversity: perspective on land use change in a dynamic cultural landscapeBiodiversity and Conservation, 2015
- Honeybee nutrition is linked to landscape compositionEcology and Evolution, 2014
- Chemical composition of the ‘low quality’ pollen of sunflower (Helianthus annuus, Asteraceae)Apidologie, 2012