"Clip first" policy in management of intracranial MCA aneurysms: Single-centre experience with a systematic review of literature
- 6 January 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Acta Neurochirurgica
- Vol. 158 (3) , 533-546
Abstract
Background The results of microsurgical treatment for middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms (ANs) have been highly satisfying for decades, notoriously posing a challenge for interventional neuroradiologists. Following the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) study results, most centres across Europe and the USA switched to a "coil first" policy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate and critically review the substantiation of this change. Methods The authors conducted a single-institution retrospective study of MCA AN treatment between January 2000 and December 2013 maintaining a “clip first” policy. The results are supplied with a literature review. Results A total of 315 MCA ANs were treated in 288 consecutive patients (209 females, 79 males). Microsurgical treatment was performed for 238 AN patients (116 ruptured, 122 unruptured) and 77 AN patients (46 ruptured, 31 unruptured) who underwent a coiling procedure. Treatment-related morbidity and mortality (MM) for unruptured ANs was 2.8 % in the microsurgical group and 10.3 % in the endovascular group. The percentage of patients with no/minor permanent neurological deficits after SAH in a good initial clinical state (HH 1–2) was 93 % in the microsurgical and 76 % in the endovascular group. A literature review identified 21 studies concerning MCA AN treatment with a specified decision-making algorithm. Microsurgery seemed superior to endovascular management regarding both clinical and radiological outcomes, although several aspects of the analysed reports might appear questionable. Conclusion Although this study has its inherent limitations, the effect brought about by microsurgical clipping of MCA ANs remains superior to that of endovascular embolisation and it should be sustained as the first treatment choice. The decision about the treatment strategy should be made by a multi-disciplinary team consisting of specialists from both teams, bearing in mind the higher occlusion rate and longevity of the surgical treatment.Keywords
Funding Information
- Czech Ministry of Defence (MO 1012)
This publication has 73 references indexed in Scilit:
- Outcome for unruptured middle cerebral artery aneurysm treatment: surgical and endovascular approach in a single centerNeurosurgical Review, 2014
- Surgical Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Angiographic and Clinical Outcomes in 143 AneurysmsJournal of Cerebrovascular and Endovascular Neurosurgery, 2012
- Outcome for Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysm SurgeryNeurosurgery, 2010
- Microneurosurgical management of middle cerebral artery bifurcation aneurysmsSurgical Neurology, 2007
- Microneurosurgical management of proximal middle cerebral artery aneurysmsSurgical Neurology, 2007
- Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatmentThe Lancet, 2003
- Multifactorial Analysis of Surgical Outcome in Patients with Unruptured Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms.Annals of Surgery, 2000
- Management of unruptured cerebral aneurysmsNeurological Research, 1996
- Analysis of 561 Patients with 690 Middle Cerebral Artery Aneurysms: Anatomic and Clinical Features As Correlated to Management OutcomeNeurosurgery, 1996
- Morbidity and mortality from elective surgery for asymptomatic, unruptured, intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysisJournal of Neurosurgery, 1994