Assessing China's Economic Catch-Up at the Firm Level and Beyond: Washington Consensus, East Asian Consensus and the Beijing Model
Authors:
- 7 July 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Industry and Innovation
- Vol. 18 (5) , 487-507
Abstract
This paper takes a new Schumpeterian economics approach in examining firm-level technological catch-up strategies in China. We focus on the strategies for learning and gaining access to a foreign knowledge base. We also underline unique Chinese features, including forward engineering (i.e. the role of university spin-off firms) in contrast to reverse engineering, acquisition of technology and brands through international mergers and acquisitions (M&A), and parallel learning from foreign direct investment (FDI) to promote indigenous companies. These features comprise the Beijing model because they were not explicitly adopted by either Korea or Taiwan. At the macro and aggregate levels, we find that China follows the “East Asian sequencing” rather than the Washington Consensus. We also discuss several challenges facing China, such as design capabilities and localization of intermediate parts. We conclude that the Chinese industry will not remain a low-end original equipment manufacturer (OEM) economy but will rise to the level of high-end or brand producers.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- From Washington Consensus to BeST Consensus for world developmentAsian-Pacific Economic Literature, 2010
- Dynamics of catch-up in mobile phones and automobiles in China: sectoral systems of innovation perspectiveChina Economic Journal, 2009
- China, India and Brazil: Tiger technologies, dragon multinationals and the building of national systems of economic learningAsian Business & Management, 2009
- Sectoral Innovation System and a Technological Catch-up: The Case of the Capital Goods Industry in KoreaGlobal Economic Review, 2008
- Changing Engines of Growth in China: From Exports, FDI and Marketization to Innovation and ExportsChina & World Economy, 2008
- Economic Development from the Perspective of Evolutionary Economic TheoryOxford Development Studies, 2008
- Linking the technological regime to the technological catch-up: analyzing Korea and Taiwan using the US patent dataIndustrial and Corporate Change, 2006
- Late Marketisation versus Late Industrialisation in East AsiaAsian-Pacific Economic Literature, 2005
- China and the global business revolutionCambridge Journal of Economics, 2002
- China's transition to markets: market-preserving federalism, chinese styleThe Journal of Policy Reform, 1996