Differential Diagnosis of Parotid Tumors on Ultrasound: Interobserver Variability and Examiner-Specific Decision Rules—A Machine Learning Approach
Authors:
- Lukas PillongLPLukas Pillong
- Ida OhnesorgIOIda Ohnesorg
- Lukas Alexander BrustLBLukas Alexander Brust
- Jan PalmJPJan Palm
- Julia Schulze-BergeJSJulia Schulze-Berge
- Victoria BozzatoVBVictoria Bozzato
- Manfred VogesMVManfred Voges
- Adrian MüllerAMAdrian Müller
- Malvina GarnerMGMalvina Garner
- Alessandro BozzatoABAlessandro Bozzato
Open Access
- 16 March 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Diagnostics
- Vol. 16 (6) , 880
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Noninvasive differentiation of parotid gland tumors remains challenging despite ultrasound being the primary imaging modality for salivary gland lesions. Given its examiner dependence, improving diagnostic consistency and transparency is crucial. We quantified interobserver variability in parotid ultrasound, modeled examiner-specific decision patterns using machine learning surrogates, and tested whether surrogate complexity relates to examiner performance. Methods: In this retrospective, single-center study, six examiners independently rated ultrasound images of 149 parotid tumors using predefined descriptors. Performance was summarized using accuracy and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). AUCs were compared using DeLong tests (Holm-adjusted). Interobserver agreement was assessed using pairwise Cohen’s and global Fleiss’ κ. For each examiner, a decision-tree surrogate was trained from structured descriptors and clinical metadata to reproduce examiner labels and visualize decision pathways; performance was estimated by 5-fold cross-validation. Results: Examiner accuracy ranged from 63.5% to 90.5% and AUC from 0.66 to 0.89 (best 0.89, 95% CI 0.83–0.95); the best performer exceeded the two lowest performers (p < 0.001). Agreement was higher for objective descriptors (size: κ = 0.57–0.97) than for subjective descriptors (echogenicity: κ = 0.11–0.79). Surrogate decision-tree accuracy versus histopathology ranged from 57.2% to 80.0% for unpruned and from 65.1% to 76.5% for pruned models, with high coverage (95.3–98.7%). Tree complexity showed no consistent association with examiner performance. Conclusions: Parotid ultrasound shows substantial interobserver variability. Interpretable surrogates can approximate individual labeling behavior from structured descriptors and clinical metadata, making examiner-dependent decision patterns explicit.Keywords
Funding Information
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
- Saarland University within the ‘Open Access Publication Funding’ program
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- An ultrasound-based ensemble machine learning model for the preoperative classification of pleomorphic adenoma and Warthin tumor in the parotid glandEuropean Radiology, 2024
- Long‐Term Facial Nerve Outcome in Primary Parotid Cancer Surgery: A Population‐Based AnalysisThe Laryngoscope, 2021
- Application value of shear wave elastography in salivary gland tumorsOral Radiology, 2021
- The use of structured reporting of head and neck ultrasound ensures time-efficiency and report quality during residencyEuropean Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2019
- ESR paper on structured reporting in radiologyInsights into Imaging, 2018
- Competency‐based assessment in surgeon‐performed head and neck ultrasonography: A validity studyThe Laryngoscope, 2017
- MRI criteria for the diagnosis of pleomorphic adenoma: a validation studyAmerican Journal of Otolaryngology, 2014
- Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoningAdvances in Health Sciences Education, 2009
- Characteristic sonographic findings of Warthin's tumor in the parotid glandJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 2004
- Note on the Sampling Error of the Difference Between Correlated Proportions or PercentagesPsychometrika, 1947