Quality in research and the significance of community assessment and peer review: education’s idiosyncrasy
- 1 November 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of Research & Method in Education
- Vol. 30 (3) , 339-352
Abstract
Calls for the quality of educational research to be monitored more carefully are examined in the context of the most widely used and trusted form of quality screening, namely, that afforded by peer review. The serious limitations of peer review for this purpose, especially in education, are outlined before discussing the place of peer review publication in the construction of a vigorously critical community of researchers and scholars. It is concluded that quality is both constructed and checked by this community and that there are indications that the scholarly community in education may be less instinctively critical than that in other academic domains. Recommendations for the improvement of quality in educational research centre on placing less emphasis on criteria for the assessment of individual pieces of research and more on the forms of discourse operating in the peer review publication community.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating Reviews: A Possible Means for Quality Control and Reward Allocation in the Review ProcessCortex, 2002
- Funding Science in America1999
- Prevalence of Articles With Honorary Authors and Ghost Authors in Peer-Reviewed Medical JournalsJAMA, 1998
- Publication Bias and Research on Passive SmokingJAMA, 1998
- Does Masking Author Identity Improve Peer Review Quality?JAMA, 1998
- Effect on the Quality of Peer Review of Blinding Reviewers and Asking Them to Sign Their ReportsJAMA, 1998
- Peer Review in PragueJAMA, 1998
- Ulcers and bacteria I: discovery and acceptanceStudies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 1998
- Problems Identified by Secondary Review of Accepted ManuscriptsJAMA, 1990
- The Effects of Blinding on the Quality of Peer ReviewJAMA, 1990