Comparison of conventional and actuarial neuropsychological criteria for mild cognitive impairment in a clinical setting
- 28 December 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
- Vol. 43 (7) , 753-765
Abstract
Evidence-based practice in neuropsychology involves the use of validated tests, cutoff scores, and interpretive algorithms to identify clinically significant cognitive deficits. Recently, actuarial...Keywords
Funding Information
- No funding
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Are Empirically-Derived Subtypes of Mild Cognitive Impairment Consistent with Conventional Subtypes?Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2013
- Conceptual and Measurement Challenges in Research on Cognitive ReserveJournal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2011
- Neuroimaging in the Clinical Diagnosis of Dementia: Observations from a Memory Disorders ClinicJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2010
- Diagnostic Accuracy of the RBANS in Mild Cognitive Impairment: Limitations on Assessing Milder ImpairmentsArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2010
- Are the Indices of the RBANS Sufficient for Differentiating Alzheimer's Disease and Subcortical Vascular Dementia?Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2010
- Quantification of Five Neuropsychological Approaches to Defining Mild Cognitive ImpairmentThe American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2009
- Utility of the RBANS in detecting cognitive impairment associated with Alzheimer's disease: Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive powersArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2008
- Characterization of the Medical Symptom Validity Test in evaluation of clinically referred memory disorders clinic patientsArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2007
- Mild Cognitive Impairment as a Clinical Entity and Treatment TargetArchives of Neurology, 2005
- Regression-based formulas for predicting change in RBANS subtests with older adultsArchives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2005