Sex-related differences in growth and carbon allocation to defence in Populus tremula as explained by current plant defence theories
Authors:
- Tendry R. RandriamananaTendry R. Randriamanana
- Pedro J. AphaloPedro J. Aphalo
- Chunyang LiCLChunyang Li
- 1 May 2014
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Tree Physiology
- Vol. 34 (5) , 471-487
Abstract
Plant defence theories have recently evolved in such a way that not only the quantity but also the quality of mineral nutrients is expected to influence plant constitutive defence. Recently, an extended prediction derived from the protein competition model (PCM) suggested that nitrogen (N) limitation is more important for the production of phenolic compounds than phosphorus (P). We aimed at studying sexual differences in the patterns of carbon allocation to growth and constitutive defence in relation to N and P availability in Populus tremula L. seedlings. We compared the gender responses in photosynthesis, growth and whole-plant allocation to phenolic compounds at different combination levels of N and P, and studied how they are explained by the main plant defence theories. We found no sexual differences in phenolic concentrations, but interestingly, slow-growing females had higher leaf N concentration than did males, and genders differed in their allocation priority. There was a trade-off between growth and the production of flavonoid-derived phenylpropanoids on one hand, and between the production of salicylates and flavonoid-derived phenylpropanoids on the other. Under limited nutrient conditions, females prioritized mineral nutrient acquisition, flavonoid and condensed tannin (CT) production, while males invested more in above-ground biomass. Salicylate accumulation followed the growth differentiation balance hypothesis as low N mainly decreased the production of leaf and stem salicylate content while the combination of both low N and low P increased the amount of flavonoids and CTs allocated to leaves and to a lesser extent stems, which agrees with the PCM. We suggest that such a discrepancy in the responses of salicylates and flavonoid-derived CTs is linked to their clearly distinct biosynthetic origins and/or their metabolic costs.Keywords
This publication has 87 references indexed in Scilit:
- Nutrient limitation on terrestrial plant growth – modeling the interaction between nitrogen and phosphorusNew Phytologist, 2012
- Tannins in plant–herbivore interactionsPhytochemistry, 2011
- Phenolic glycosides of the Salicaceae and their role as anti-herbivore defensesPhytochemistry, 2011
- Conifer expansion reduces the competitive ability and herbivore defense of aspen by modifying light environment and soil chemistryTree Physiology, 2011
- Effects of nitrogen fertilization on tritrophic interactionsArthropod-Plant Interactions, 2010
- Carbon allocation and nitrogen acquisition in a developingPopulus deltoidesplantationTree Physiology, 2004
- Carbohydrate translocation determines the phenolic content of Populus foliage: a test of the sink–source model of plant defenseNew Phytologist, 2004
- Growth and physiology of aspen supplied with different fertilizer addition ratesPhysiologia Plantarum, 1998
- Resource Limitation in Plants-An Economic AnalogyAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1985
- Carbon/Nutrient Balance of Boreal Plants in Relation to Vertebrate HerbivoryOikos, 1983