Benefit of isolated surgical valve repair or replacement for functional tricuspid regurgitation and long-term outcomes stratified by the TRI-SCORE
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 30 August 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Heart Journal
- Vol. 45 (42) , 4512-4522
Abstract
Background and Aims: Severe tricuspid regurgitation is associated with increased mortality rates, but benefit of its correction and ideal timing are not clearly determined. This study aimed to identify patient subsets who might benefit from the surgery. Methods: In TRIGISTRY, an international cohort study of consecutive patients with severe isolated functional tricuspid regurgitation (33 centres, 10 countries), survival rates up to 10 years were compared between patients who underwent isolated tricuspid valve surgery (repair or replacement) and those conservatively managed, overall and according to TRI-SCORE category (low: ≤3, intermediate: 4–5, and high: ≥6). Results: One thousand and two hundred seventeen were managed conservatively, and 551 underwent isolated tricuspid valve surgery (200 repairs and 351 replacements). TRI-SCORE distribution was 33% low, 32% intermediate, and 35% high. At 10 years, survival rates were similar between surgical and conservative management [41% vs. 36%; hazard ratio (HR) .97; 95% confidence interval (CI) .88–1.08, P = .57]. Surgery improved survival compared with conservative management in the low TRI-SCORE category (72% vs. 44%; HR .27; 95% CI .20–.37, P < .0001), but not in the intermediate (36% vs. 37%; HR 1.17; 95%CI .98–1.40, P = .09) or high categories (20% vs. 24%; HR 1.06; 95% CI .91–1.25, P = .45). Both repair and replacement improved survival in the low TRI-SCORE category (84% and 61% vs. 44%; HR .11; 95% CI .06–.19, P < .0001, and HR .65; 95% CI .47–.90, P = .009). Repair showed benefit in the intermediate category (59% vs. 37%; HR .49; 95% CI .35–.68, P < .0001) while replacement was possibly harmful (25% vs. 37%; HR 1.43; 95% CI 1.18–1.72, P = .0002). Conclusions: Higher survival rates were observed with repair than replacement and benefit of intervention declined as TRI-SCORE increased with no benefit of any type of surgery in the high TRI-SCORE category. These results emphasize the importance of timely intervention and patient selection to achieve the best outcomes and the need for randomized controlled trials.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Outcomes of Isolated Tricuspid Valve SurgeryThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2023
- TRI-SCORE is superior to EuroSCORE II and STS-Score in mortality prediction following transcatheter edge-to-edge tricuspid valve repairClinical Research in Cardiology, 2023
- Management and Outcome of Patients Admitted With Tricuspid Regurgitation in FranceCanadian Journal of Cardiology, 2021
- Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation on Survival in Patients with Heart Failure: A Large Electronic Health Record Patient-Level Database AnalysisEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2020
- Transcatheter Versus Medical Treatment of Patients With Symptomatic Severe Tricuspid RegurgitationJACC, 2019
- Surgery Does Not Improve Survival in Patients With Isolated Severe Tricuspid RegurgitationJACC, 2019
- Timing of Referral of Patients With Severe Isolated Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation to Surgeons (from a French Nationwide Database)The American Journal of Cardiology, 2018
- National Trends and Outcomes in Isolated Tricuspid Valve SurgeryJACC, 2017
- Recommendations for Noninvasive Evaluation of Native Valvular RegurgitationJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 2017
- Impact of tricuspid regurgitation on long-term survivalJACC, 2004