Big Team Science for language science: opportunities and challenges
Authors:
- Matthew FaytakMFMatthew Faytak
- Šárka KadaváŠKŠárka Kadavá
- Chenzi XuCXChenzi Xu
- Onur ÖzsoyOnur Özsoy
- Pius W. AkumbuPAPius W. Akumbu
- Mark AmengualMark Amengual
- Amalia ArvanitiAAAmalia Arvaniti
- Malte BelzMBMalte Belz
- Dorotea BevivinoDBDorotea Bevivino
- Amanda CardosoACAmanda Cardoso
- Joseph Vincent CasillasJCJoseph Vincent Casillas
- Tiphaine CaudrelierTCTiphaine Caudrelier
Open Access
- 6 November 2026
- journal article
- Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH in Linguistics
Abstract
The present paper advocates for incorporating Big Team Science practices into the language sciences. Big Team Science is a promising mode of collaborative research in which top-down coordination directs efforts by a large number of researchers from different institutions towards a common scientific goal. The redistribution of resources and division of labor enabled by Big Team Science may enable researchers to increase methodological rigor, systematically explore claims across a wider sample of languages, and to diversify both the languages studied and the researchers engaged. However, implementing Big Team Science practices is not without challenges, some of which are unique to the language sciences. We suggest strategies and best practices for adapting to these challenges, including theoretical and methodological pluralism, variation in conditions among data collection sites, and navigating a trade-off between maximizing methodological rigor and ability to engage with the most inclusive, typologically broad language samples.Keywords
Funding Information
- The Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship
- the European Research Council (ERC-ADG-835263)
- The Laboratory of Excellence Empirical Foundations of Linguistics programme (ANR-10-LABX-0083)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (and CW 10/1-1 (project ID 502013782))
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (FU791/9-1)
- The Research Council of Norway (350026)
This publication has 205 references indexed in Scilit:
- Digital Language Equality: Definition, Metric, Dashboard2023
- Why most psychological research findings are not even wrongInfant and Child Development, 2022
- Phonetic cue weighting in perception and productionWIREs Cognitive Science, 2019
- How can we ensure visibility and diversity in research contributions? How the Contributor Role Taxonomy (CRediT) is helping the shift from authorship to contributorshipLearned Publishing, 2019
- Studying Psycholinguistics out of the Lab2017
- Contact as a Source of Language Change2017
- Collecting and Analyzing Sign Language Data2015
- Documentary and Corpus Approaches to Sign Language Research2015
- Entering the Community2013
- A Typology of Spontaneous Speech1997