Comparative Evaluation of the Measurement Properties of Various Shoulder Outcome Instruments
Authors:
- 29 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in The American Journal of Sports Medicine
- Vol. 37 (6) , 1161-1168
Abstract
Background Various shoulder outcome instruments have been used despite lack of information on their measurement properties; reliability, responsiveness, and validity; and correlation with health-related quality of life.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality of life assessments with SF 36 in different musculoskeletal diseasesClinical Rheumatology, 2007
- Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simple shoulder test: Psychometric properties by age and injury typeJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2007
- Responsiveness of self-report scales in patients recovering from rotator cuff surgeryJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 2006
- Shoulder Outcome MeasuresThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2004
- Scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulderArthroscopy, 2003
- Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteriaClinical Therapeutics, 1996
- Scoring Systems for Shoulder ConditionsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 1996
- A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder functionJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 1994
- Incomplete Rotator Cuff TearsClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1992
- The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36)Medical Care, 1992