Effect of Pneumatic Compression and Manual Massage on Fatigue Recovery and Performance in Under-20 Soccer Athletes: A Cross-Sectional Crossover Study
Authors:
- Tiago Costa EstevesTiago Costa Esteves
- Júlio Cesar de Oliveira Muniz CunhaJCJúlio Cesar de Oliveira Muniz Cunha
- Júlio Guilherme SilvaJSJúlio Guilherme Silva
- María Rúa-AlonsoMaría Rúa-Alonso
- Luciano Teixeira dos SantosLSLuciano Teixeira dos Santos
- Laercio Brehner Gemaque Do CoutoLaercio Brehner Gemaque Do Couto
- José Vilaça-AlvesJosé Vilaça-Alves
- Estêvão Rios MonteiroEstêvão Rios Monteiro
- Igor Ramathur Telles de JesusIJIgor Ramathur Telles de Jesus
Preprint
- 8 July 2025
- preprint
- Published by MDPI AG in Preprints.org
Abstract
Introduction: Acute neuromuscular fatigue impairs athletic performance and increases the risk of musculoskeletal injury. Recovery strategies such as manual massage (MM) and intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) have been proposed to mitigate these effects, although their efficacy remains controversial. Objective: To compare the MM and IPC effects on muscle damage recovery, lower limb strength, and power in Under-20 soccer athletes. Methods: A cross-sectional crossover studyn was conducted with twenty male youth athletes (n = 20) from the under-20 category (18.65 ± 0.67 years) of Paysandu Sport Club – Brazil, who underwent a fatigue protocol followed by either MM or IPC, with a seven-day washout between sessions. The following variables were assessed: serum creatine kinase (CK), quadriceps and hamstrings isometric voluntary contraction (IVC), and vertical jump (VJ). Results: CK decreased following the MM (pre: 382.50 ± 163.02 U/L; post: 305.40 ± 239.98 U/L; p=0.042) but not for IPC (pre: 337 ± 114.50 U/L; post: 199 ± 89.50 U/L); p=0.16). After the crossover, IPC elicited a significant reduction in CK (pre: 307 ± 198 U/L; post: 256 ± 84.75 U/L; p=0.028), whereas MM did not reach statistical significance (pre: 316.70 ± 116.66 U/L; post: 252.50 ± 91.77 U/L; p=0.094). Neither intervention (MM or IPC) resulted in significant improvements in Quadriceps or Hamstring (p>0.05) IVC or VJ height (p>0.05). Conclusion: MM and IPC are viable recovery tools to mitigate biochemical markers of muscle stress without compromising performance, a crucial consideration for high-performance environments where recovery windows are narrow.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hemodynamic Effects of Intermittent Pneumatic Compression on Athletes: A Double-Blinded Randomized Crossover StudyInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2024
- The Effects of Massage Therapy on Sport and Exercise Performance: A Systematic ReviewSports, 2023
- Monitoring the post-match neuromuscular fatigue of young Turkish football playersScientific Reports, 2022
- The acute effect of two massage techniques on functional capability and balance in recreationally trained older adult women: A cross-over studyJournal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 2021
- Pneumatic Compression Fails to Improve Performance Recovery in Trained CyclistsInternational Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 2018
- A randomized controlled trial of manual therapy and pneumatic compression for recovery from prolonged running – an extended studyResearch in Sports Medicine, 2018
- Massage and Performance Recovery: A Meta-Analytical ReviewSports Medicine, 2016
- Does Intermittent Pneumatic Leg Compression Enhance Muscle Recovery after Strenuous Eccentric Exercise?International Journal of Sports Medicine, 2013
- Seven myths of randomisation in clinical trialsStatistics in Medicine, 2012
- Muscle Soreness and Delayed-Onset Muscle SorenessClinics in Sports Medicine, 2012