Using propensity score matching for sequential recruitment in multigroup cohort studies
- 30 March 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Behavioral Medicine
- Vol. 49 (2) , 307-327
Abstract
Multigroup cohort studies are used to compare exposed and unexposed groups on important outcomes. Recruitment for these studies can be done simultaneously or sequentially. When recruitment is simultaneous, there are many advanced statistical techniques, including propensity score matching, that can be used to select balanced groups to account for confounders of the effect of the exposure on the outcome. This paper presents a novel method for using propensity score matching for sequential recruitment using a five-step modular approach: (1) estimate propensity scores, (2) create propensity clusters, (3) match participants, (4) create holdout groups, and (5) enroll. These steps are repeated each recruitment period. We explain each step, providing R code to assist researchers in implementation, then demonstrate the performance of the method in a multigroup cohort study examining the effects of posttraumatic stress disorder on cardiovascular risk markers among trauma-exposed individuals. The method performed well and improved balance compared to using no selection technique, and it also performed similarly to propensity score matching with simultaneous recruitment. This method provides a novel approach to sequential recruitment in multigroup cohort studies. Future research should explore how more sophisticated methods for selecting covariates, generating propensity scores, and selecting matches could improve this method further.Keywords
Funding Information
- Division of Intramural Research (R01HL139614)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR001881)
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Personality and cardiovascular mortality risk: a multi-cohort analysis in individuals with and without pre-existing cardiovascular diseaseJournal of Behavioral Medicine, 2024
- Comparative Effectiveness of Usual Care With or Without Chiropractic Care in Patients with Recurrent Musculoskeletal Back and Neck PainJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2018
- A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity scoreStatistics in Medicine, 2013
- One‐to‐many propensity score matching in cohort studiesPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2012
- Measuring balance and model selection in propensity score methodsPharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, 2011
- Improving propensity score weighting using machine learningStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Balance diagnostics for comparing the distribution of baseline covariates between treatment groups in propensity‐score matched samplesStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- A comparison of propensity score methods: a case‐study estimating the effectiveness of post‐AMI statin useStatistics in Medicine, 2005
- Constructing Matched Sets and Strata2002
- Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control groupStatistics in Medicine, 1998