Feasibility of using self-reported patient data in a national diabetes register
Open Access
- 1 June 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Health Services Research
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-7
Abstract
In order to improve recruitment of patients to the Norwegian diabetes register for adults, a questionnaire was designed to collect data directly from patients. The main aim of this study was to assess the agreement of questionnaire data with data reported to the Register from health care personnel during routine consultations. Patient data were obtained by sending a questionnaire with 27 of the 41 Register variables to 3714 members of the Norwegian Diabetes Association. Questionnaire data were compared with data already in the Register. Paired t-tests, percentages of total agreement, percentages of “positive” answers and kappa coefficients (k) were used for comparing data. Of the 1645 replies (44.3 %), the Register already had data on 324 patients for comparison. Response rate for most variables was better from patients (ranging from 76–100 %) compared with health care professionals (33–100 %). For 17 of 25 assessable variables including diabetes duration, height, weight, HbA1c, drug treatment and several diabetes complications, agreement was substantial or better with kappa >0.60. Data on family history of premature heart disease (k–0.59), foot examination (k = 0.26), foot ulcer (k = 0.32) and arterial surgery (k = 0.24) seemed to be difficult to answer by patients, whereas data on physical activity and self-monitoring of glucose seemed to be better when reported by patients. Patient response rate was acceptable, and data had good concordance with data from health care professionals for most variables. However, registers using patient questionnaires should compare questionnaire data with data from professionals at regular intervals.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ascertainment of chronic diseases using population health data: a comparison of health administrative data and patient self-reportBMC Public Health, 2013
- Medical Record Validation of Self-Reported Eye Diseases and Eye Care Utilization Among Older AdultsCurrent Eye Research, 2012
- Agreement of self-reported comorbid conditions with medical and physician reports varied by disease among end-stage renal disease patientsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2007
- A comparison of direct vs. self‐report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic reviewObesity Reviews, 2007
- What is the Concordance Between the Medical Record and Patient Self-Report as Data Sources for Ambulatory Care?Medical Care, 2006
- Postanalytical External Quality Assessment of Blood Glucose and Hemoglobin A1c: An International SurveyClinical Chemistry, 2005
- Agreement between self-report questionnaires and medical record data was substantial for diabetes, hypertension, myocardial infarction and stroke but not for heart failureJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004
- Defining and Improving Data Quality in Medical Registries: A Literature Review, Case Study, and Generic FrameworkJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2002
- Do Persons With Diabetes Know Their (AIC) Number?The Diabetes Educator, 2002
- Is questionnaire information valid in the study of a chronic disease such as diabetes? The Nord-Trøndelag diabetes study.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1992