Interprofessional collaboration regarding patients’ care plans in primary care: a focus group study into influential factors
Open Access
- 28 May 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Family Practice
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
The number of people with multiple chronic conditions demanding primary care services is increasing. To deal with the complex health care demands of these people, professionals from different disciplines collaborate. This study aims to explore influential factors regarding interprofessional collaboration related to care plan development in primary care. A qualitative study, including four semi-structured focus group interviews (n = 4). In total, a heterogeneous group of experts (n = 16) and health care professionals (n = 15) participated. Participants discussed viewpoints, barriers, and facilitators regarding interprofessional collaboration related to care plan development. The data were analysed by means of inductive content analysis. The findings show a variety of factors influencing the interprofessional collaboration in developing a care plan. Factors can be divided into 5 key categories: (1) patient-related factors: active role, self-management, goals and wishes, membership of the team; (2) professional-related factors: individual competences, domain thinking, motivation; (3) interpersonal factors: language differences, knowing each other, trust and respect, and motivation; (4) organisational factors: structure, composition, time, shared vision, leadership and administrative support; and (5) external factors: education, culture, hierarchy, domain thinking, law and regulations, finance, technology and ICT. Improving interprofessional collaboration regarding care plan development calls for an integral approach including patient- and professional related factors, interpersonal, organisational, and external factors. Further, the leader of the team seems to play a key role in watching the patient perspective, organising and coordinating interprofessional collaborations, and guiding the team through developments. The results of this study can be used as input for developing tools and interventions targeted at executing and improving interprofessional collaboration related to care plan development.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Experiences of care planning in England: interviews with patients with long term conditionsBMC Family Practice, 2012
- Goal setting and action planning in the rehabilitation setting: development of a theoretically informed practice frameworkClinical Rehabilitation, 2010
- Multimorbidity: a challenge for evidence-based medicineBMJ Evidence-Based Medicine, 2010
- Goal-setting for behavior change in primary care: An exploration and status reportPatient Education and Counseling, 2009
- Systematic Review of the Effects of Shared Decision-Making on Patient Satisfaction, Treatment Adherence and Health StatusPsychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 2008
- What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature reviewInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2008
- Three Approaches to Qualitative Content AnalysisQualitative Health Research, 2005
- Can a facilitated programme promote effective multidisciplinary audit in secondary care teams? An exploratory trialInternational Journal of Nursing Studies, 2005
- The determinants of successful collaboration: A review of theoretical and empirical studiesJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2005
- The conceptual basis for interprofessional collaboration: Core concepts and theoretical frameworksJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2005