Refining the Phenotype of Recurrent Rearrangements of Chromosome 16
Authors:
- Serena RedaelliSRSerena Redaelli
- Silvia MaitzSMSilvia Maitz
- Francesca CrostiFCFrancesca Crosti
- Elena SalaESElena Sala
- Nicoletta VillaNVNicoletta Villa
- Luigina SpacciniLSLuigina Spaccini
- Angelo SelicorniASAngelo Selicorni
- Miriam RigoldiMRMiriam Rigoldi
- Donatella ConconiDCDonatella Conconi
- Leda DalpràLDLeda Dalprà
- Gaia RoversiGRGaia Roversi
- Angela BentivegnaAngela Bentivegna
Open Access
- 4 March 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Vol. 20 (5) , 1095
Abstract
Chromosome 16 is one of the most gene-rich chromosomes of our genome, and 10% of its sequence consists of segmental duplications, which give instability and predisposition to rearrangement by the recurrent mechanism of non-allelic homologous recombination. Microarray technologies have allowed for the analysis of copy number variations (CNVs) that can contribute to the risk of developing complex diseases. By array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) screening of 1476 patients, we detected 27 cases with CNVs on chromosome 16. We identified four smallest regions of overlapping (SROs): one at 16p13.11 was found in seven patients; one at 16p12.2 was found in four patients; two close SROs at 16p11.2 were found in twelve patients; finally, six patients were found with atypical rearrangements. Although phenotypic variability was observed, we identified a male bias for Childhood Apraxia of Speech associated to 16p11.2 microdeletions. We also reported an elevated frequency of second-site genomic alterations, supporting the model of the second hit to explain the clinical variability associated with CNV syndromes. Our goal was to contribute to the building of a chromosome 16 disease-map based on disease susceptibility regions. The role of the CNVs of chromosome 16 was increasingly made clear in the determination of developmental delay. We also found that in some cases a second-site CNV could explain the phenotypic heterogeneity by a simple additive effect or a pejorative synergistic effect.Keywords
Funding Information
- Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca (2015-CONT-0089, 2016-ATE-0511)
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Developmental trajectories for young children with 16p11.2 copy number variationAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part B: Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 2017
- Systems-level chromosomal parameters represent a suprachromosomal basis for the non-random chromosomal arrangement in human interphase nucleiScientific Reports, 2016
- Emergence of a Homo sapiens-specific gene family and chromosome 16p11.2 CNV susceptibilityNature, 2016
- 16p11.2 deletion and duplication: Characterizing neurologic phenotypes in a large clinically ascertained cohortAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 2016
- Deletion and duplication of 16p11.2 are associated with opposing effects on visual evoked potential amplitudeMolecular Autism, 2016
- Two novel copy number variations involving the α-globin gene cluster on chromosome 16 cause thalassemia in two Chinese familiesMolecular Genetics and Genomics, 2016
- Recurrent copy number variations as risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders: critical overview and analysis of clinical implicationsJournal of Medical Genetics, 2015
- Extending the phenotype of recurrent rearrangements of 16p11.2: Deletions in mentally retarded patients without autism and in normal individualsEuropean Journal of Medical Genetics, 2009
- Recurrent duplication-driven transposition of DNA during hominoid evolutionProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2006
- The sequence and analysis of duplication-rich human chromosome 16Nature, 2004