Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants
Authors:
- Joanna H. LowensteinJLJoanna H. Lowenstein
- Susan NittrouerSNSusan Nittrouer
- 1 June 2016
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Otology & Neurotology
- Vol. 37 (5) , 470-477
Abstract
Cochlear implants (CIs) do not automatically restore speech recognition for postlingually deafened adults. Average word recognition remains at 60%, and enormous variability exists. Understanding speech requires knowledge of phonemic codes, the basic sound units of language. Hearing loss may result in degeneration of these long-term mental representations (i.e., "phonemic sensitivity"), and CI use may not adequately restore those representations. This investigation examined whether phonemic sensitivity is degraded for CI users, and whether this degradation results in poorer word recognition. Thirty adults with CIs and 20 normal-hearing controls underwent testing. Participants were assessed for word recognition in quiet, along with tasks of phonemic sensitivity using an audiovisual format to maximize recognition: initial consonant choice (ICC), in which they selected the word with the same starting sound as a target word, final consonant choice (FCC), in which they selected the word with the same ending sound, and backwards words, in which they repeated phonemes comprising words in backwards order. Phonemic sensitivity was poorer for CI users than for normal-hearing controls for ICC and FCC. For CI users, ICC and FCC predicted 25% and 40% of variance in word recognition, respectively. Longer duration of CI use did not lead to greater restoration in phonemic sensitivity. Even for adults who presumably had developed refined phonemic representations, hearing loss can degrade those representations, which results in poorer word recognition. Cochlear implants do not adequately restore those representations. Findings suggest the need for rehabilitative efforts to improve CI users' phonemic sensitivity.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- Factors Affecting Open-Set Word Recognition in Adults With Cochlear ImplantsEar & Hearing, 2013
- Speech Recognition Materials and Ceiling Effects: Considerations for Cochlear Implant ProgramsAudiology and Neurotology, 2008
- Dyslexia and the anchoring-deficit hypothesisTrends in Cognitive Sciences, 2007
- Recognition of Speech Presented at Soft to Loud Levels by Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients of Three Cochlear Implant SystemsEar & Hearing, 2004
- Speech recognition in noise as a function of the number of spectral channels: Comparison of acoustic hearing and cochlear implantsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2001
- The Influence of Contextual Information on the Perception of Speech by Postlingually and Prelingually Profoundly Hearing-Impaired Hebrew-Speaking Adolescents and AdultsEar & Hearing, 2001
- Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognitionThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1988
- Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictabilityThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1977
- Perception of the speech code.Psychological Review, 1967
- Some perceptual consequences of linguistic rulesJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1963