Effects of Nature-Derived Biostimulants on Wheat Rhizosphere Microbial Biomass, Diversity, and Networks
Authors:
- Oumaima AkachoudOAOumaima Akachoud
- Paola Villanueva RosalesPRPaola Villanueva Rosales
- Joël FontaineJFJoël Fontaine
- Jérôme DuclercqJérôme Duclercq
- Natacha FaconNFNatacha Facon
- Frédéric LaruelleFLFrédéric Laruelle
- Jamil SamsatlyJSJamil Samsatly
- Hacène MeglouliHMHacène Meglouli
- Mohamed HijriMohamed Hijri
- Anissa Lounès-Hadj SahraouiAnissa Lounès-Hadj Sahraoui
Open Access
- 25 August 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Agriculture
- Vol. 16 (17) , 1821
Abstract
Plant biostimulants are increasingly recognized as natural solutions that enhance plant growth and support sustainable agriculture. However, their effects on soil microbial communities remain poorly understood. This study evaluated three biostimulants: Plantiful™ (fermented marine algae with beneficial bacteria), CelexT07™ (fermented medicinal plants with beneficial bacteria), and Phylgreen™ (seaweed extract), compared with water and conventional NPK fertilization. Rhizospheric microbial biomass, community structure, and metabolic potential were assessed using metabarcoding, phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) profiling, and Biolog EcoPlates™ assays. Total microbial biomass did not differ significantly from the untreated control. Similarly, bacterial biomass (7.4–9.8 µg/g soil) remained stable across treatments. Saprotrophic fungal biomass was 2–4-fold lower under PhylgreenTM and CelexT07TM than NPK, but comparable to the control. Bacterial and fungal communities were dominated by Actinobacteriota, Pseudomonadota, Acidobacteriota, Chloroflexota, and Ascomycota, with similar richness and diversity across treatments in wheat rhizosphere soil after 9 weeks of growth. Functional analyses revealed only modest shifts, with AWCD being significantly reduced by 43.5% under Phylgreen™ (64.11) compared with NPK (113.44), while remaining comparable to the untreated control (94.74). The network analysis results were also consistent with the previous results, indicating that biostimulant treatments maintained microbial richness. Overall, these findings support the use of the tested biostimulants as sustainable crop management tools that preserve rhizosphere microbial communities.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Commission
- French State
- French Region of Hauts-de-France
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-25-PRIM-0002)
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Seaweed-derived biostimulants for sustainable crop production: A reviewJournal of Biotechnology, 2025
- Effect of different composts on the dynamic of soil organic pollutants, microbial network interactions and multifunctionality in an urban garden made from a former brownfieldJournal of Environmental Management, 2025
- Effects of biostimulant application on soil biological and physicochemical properties: A field studyJournal of Sustainable Agriculture and Environment, 2023
- Fatty acid 16:1ω5 as a proxy for arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal biomass: current challenges and ways forwardBiology and Fertility of Soils, 2022
- Survival of a commercial AM fungal inoculant and its impact on indigenous AM fungal communities in field soilsApplied Soil Ecology, 2021
- Soil properties and climate affect arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and soil microbial communities in Mediterranean rainfed cereal cropping systemsPedobiologia, 2021
- Saprotrophic fungal communities in arable soils are strongly associated with soil fertility and stoichiometryApplied Soil Ecology, 2021
- FUNGuild: An open annotation tool for parsing fungal community datasets by ecological guildFungal Ecology, 2016
- Data transformations in the analysis of community-level substrate utilization data from microplatesJournal of Microbiological Methods, 2007
- Microbial biomass measured as total lipid phosphate in soils of different organic contentJournal of Microbiological Methods, 1991