No Root No Fruit: The Impact of a Divergence Between Ownership Concentration and Board Composition on Corporate Innovation
Authors:
- 15 September 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Corporate Governance: An International Review
Abstract
Research Question/Issue: This study investigates the impact of an underexplored dimension of board characteristics, that is, the divergence between ownership concentration and board composition (hereafter, OB divergence), on corporate innovation. Research Findings/Insights: Using a sample of Chinese listed firms from 2007 to 2021 and firm‐ and year‐fixed‐effects regressions, we find that OB divergence is negatively associated with corporate innovation output. Mechanism analyses provide evidence consistent with financial reporting opacity and managerial agency costs as channels through which OB divergence impedes corporate innovation. Cross‐sectional analyses demonstrate that the adverse effect of OB divergence is more pronounced in geographically dispersed firms and in firms with weaker market power, consistent with the view that lower information transparency and weaker access to external capital amplify this adverse effect. We also find that such divergence is more detrimental to innovation when large shareholders have stronger monitoring incentives, when independent directors have less influence, and when other governance mechanisms are relatively weaker. Theoretical/Academic Implications: Our study uncovers the negative impact of an underexplored dimension of board structure on corporate innovation and provides novel evidence on the governance role of large shareholders, a role that has received relatively less attention in prior research emphasizing large shareholders' expropriation of minority shareholders. Practitioner/Policy Implications: Our paper highlights the need to reassess the governance role of large shareholders and avoid an overemphasis on minority investor protection that may unintentionally weaken large shareholders' incentives and ability to monitor management. Policymakers should also strengthen the monitoring capacity and influence of independent directors, particularly in emerging markets.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (72262032)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (72402200)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (71762025)
- Applied Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Province (202301AU070091)
This publication has 116 references indexed in Scilit:
- Auditor-provided nonpublic signals of misreporting and CFO dismissalReview of Accounting Studies, 2025
- Bankruptcy in groupsReview of Accounting Studies, 2023
- Board experiential diversity and corporate radical innovationStrategic Management Journal, 2023
- Large shareholders, control contestability and firm productive efficiencyAnnals of Operations Research, 2019
- The architecture of attention: Group structure and subsidiary autonomyStrategic Management Journal, 2019
- What determines the severity of tunneling in China?Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 2018
- The Impact of Geographic and Cultural Dispersion on Information OpacityThe Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 2017
- Blockholder exit threats in the presence of private benefits of controlReview of Accounting Studies, 2017
- Independent directors' dissent on boards: Evidence from listed companies in ChinaStrategic Management Journal, 2015
- Propping through related party transactionsReview of Accounting Studies, 2008