Descriptive analysis of low versus elevated intracranial pressure on cerebral physiology in adult traumatic brain injury: a CENTER-TBI exploratory study
Authors:
- CENTER-TBI High Resolution (HR ICU) Sub-Study Participants and InvestigatorsCICENTER-TBI High Resolution (HR ICU) Sub-Study Participants and Investigators
- Frederick A. ZeilerFZFrederick A. Zeiler
- Ari ErcoleAEAri Ercole
- Manuel CabeleiraMCManuel Cabeleira
- Nino StocchettiNSNino Stocchetti
- Peter J. HutchinsonPHPeter J. Hutchinson
- Peter SmielewskiPSPeter Smielewski
- Marek CzosnykaMCMarek Czosnyka
Open Access
- 4 September 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Acta Neurochirurgica
- Vol. 162 (11) , 2695-2706
Abstract
Background: To date, the cerebral physiologic consequences of persistently elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) have been based on either low-resolution physiologic data or retrospective high-frequency data from single centers. The goal of this study was to provide a descriptive multi-center analysis of the cerebral physiologic consequences of ICP, comparing those with normal ICP to those with elevated ICP. Methods: The Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) High-Resolution Intensive Care Unit (HR-ICU) sub-study cohort was utilized. The first 3 days of physiologic recording were analyzed, evaluating and comparing those patients with mean ICP < 15 mmHg versus those with mean ICP > 20 mmHg. Various cerebral physiologic parameters were derived and evaluated, including ICP, brain tissue oxygen (PbtO2), cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP), pulse amplitude of ICP (AMP), cerebrovascular reactivity, and cerebral compensatory reserve. The percentage time and dose above/below thresholds were also assessed. Basic descriptive statistics were employed in comparing the two cohorts. Results: 185 patients were included, with 157 displaying a mean ICP below 15 mmHg and 28 having a mean ICP above 20 mmHg. For admission demographics, only admission Marshall and Rotterdam CT scores were statistically different between groups (p = 0.017 and p = 0.030, respectively). The high ICP group displayed statistically worse CPP, PbtO2, cerebrovascular reactivity, and compensatory reserve. The high ICP group displayed worse 6-month mortality (p < 0.0001) and poor outcome (p = 0.014), based on the Extended Glasgow Outcome Score. Conclusions: Low versus high ICP during the first 72 h after moderate/severe TBI is associated with significant disparities in CPP, AMP, cerebrovascular reactivity, cerebral compensatory reserve, and brain tissue oxygenation metrics. Such ICP extremes appear to be strongly related to 6-month patient outcomes, in keeping with previous literature. This work provides multi-center validation for previously described single-center retrospective results.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Cambridge
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI)Neurosurgery, 2015
- Predicting Outcome in Traumatic Brain InjuryNeurosurgery, 2014
- Intracranial Pressure Monitoring: Fundamental Considerations and Rationale for MonitoringNeurocritical Care, 2014
- A Trial of Intracranial-Pressure Monitoring in Traumatic Brain InjuryNew England Journal of Medicine, 2012
- Continuous Monitoring of Cerebrovascular Reactivity Using Pulse Waveform of Intracranial PressureNeurocritical Care, 2012
- Critical Thresholds for Cerebrovascular Reactivity After Traumatic Brain InjuryNeurocritical Care, 2011
- INDEX OF CEREBROSPINAL COMPENSATORY RESERVE IN HYDROCEPHALUSNeurosurgery, 2009
- Predictive value of initial computerized tomography scan, intracranial pressure, and state of autoregulation in patients with traumatic brain injuryJournal of Neurosurgery, 2006
- Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injuryNeurocritical Care, 2006
- Age, intracranial pressure, autoregulation, and outcome after brain traumaJournal of Neurosurgery, 2005