Survey Response Rates and Survey Administration in Counseling and Clinical Psychology
Authors:
- 15 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 69 (3) , 389-403
Abstract
This article reports results of a meta-analysis of survey response rates in published research in counseling and clinical psychology over a 20-year span and describes reported survey administration procedures in those fields. Results of 308 survey administrations showed a weighted average response rate of 49.6%. Among possible moderators, response rates differed only by population sampled, journal in which articles were published, sampling source and method, and use of follow-up. Researchers whose studies were included in this meta-analysis used follow-up but rarely used incentives, prenotification, or other response-facilitation methods to maximize response rates. Although the future of survey research in general may rely more heavily on Internet data collection, mail surveys dominate in this field.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Changes in Telephone Survey Nonresponse over the Past Quarter CenturyPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2005
- Ethics in Human Subjects Research: Do Incentives Matter?The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy: A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine, 2004
- Adolescent and Parent Perspectives on Ethical Issues in Youth Drug Use and Suicide Survey ResearchEthics & Behavior, 2003
- Using the Internet for Surveys and Health ResearchJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2002
- Likelihood of Participating in Mail Survey ResearchIndustrial Marketing Management, 2000
- Response Rate in Academic Studies-A Comparative AnalysisHuman Relations, 1999
- Working with Low Survey Response Rates: The Efficacy of Weighting AdjustmentsResearch in Higher Education, 1997
- Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-AnalysisPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1993
- Response Rates in Survey Research: A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Monetary GratuitiesThe Journal of Experimental Education, 1992
- Mail Survey Response Rate: A Meta-Analysis of Selected Techniques for Inducing ResponsePublic Opinion Quarterly, 1988