A Multisite Intervention for Pediatric Community‐acquired Pneumonia in Community Settings
Open Access
- 7 March 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Academic Emergency Medicine
- Vol. 25 (8) , 870-879
Abstract
Objectives The majority of children with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) are primarily evaluated in community hospital emergency departments (EDs); however, studies on the management of pediatric CAP have largely targeted care provided in freestanding children's hospital EDs or inpatient settings. The objectives of this study were to examine whether implementation of a CAP pathway within three community hospital EDs and inpatient units improved process measures related to appropriate laboratory testing and antibiotic prescribing and to compare performance on these measures between the community hospitals and a freestanding children's hospital. Methods Through a multidisciplinary approach (including general emergency medicine [EM] providers, pediatric fellowship-trained EM providers, and pediatric hospitalists), a CAP pathway was designed and implemented at three community hospitals in January and February 2016. Diagnostic and therapeutic process measures were collected using administrative data and medical record abstraction 1 year pre- and postintervention. Chi-square statistics and statistical process control P-charts were used to examine adherence to these process measures. Results Across the community hospitals, 544 patients preintervention and 321 patients postintervention met inclusion criteria, with 290 children's hospital patients meeting criteria in the postintervention period. Adherence to process measures increased postintervention for appropriate laboratory testing, narrow-spectrum antibiotic stewardship and macrolide stewardship by 10.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.7% to 16.9%), 8.3% (95% CI = 21.5% to 15.2%), and 3.1% (95% CI = –4.3% to 10.4%), respectively. Statistical process control P-charts demonstrated special cause variation immediately after implementation of the intervention in regards to appropriate laboratory testing. Conclusion Implementation of a CAP pathway through a multisite community hospital intervention improved adherence to evidence-based recommendations for laboratory testing and antibiotic stewardship. Similar interventions may improve the quality of care for children with CAP on a population level, as community hospitals are where these patients are seen most frequently.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Washington Department of Pediatrics and Seattle Children's Hospital Quality Improvement Scholar's Program
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Comprehensive Approach to Pediatric Pneumonia: Relationship Between Standardization, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Clinical Testing, and CostJournal for Healthcare Quality, 2017
- A Quality Improvement Initiative to Decrease the Rate of Solitary Blood Cultures in the Emergency DepartmentAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2017
- Standardized Clinical Pathways for Hospitalized Children and OutcomesPediatrics, 2016
- Variation in Resource Utilization for the Management of Uncomplicated Community-Acquired Pneumonia across Community and Children's HospitalsThe Journal of Pediatrics, 2014
- Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm: A New Method to Stratify Children by Medical ComplexityPediatrics, 2014
- Quality improvement methods improve inhaled corticosteroid prescribing in the emergency departmentJournal of Asthma, 2014
- Emergency Department Management of Childhood Pneumonia in the United States Prior to Publication of National GuidelinesAcademic Emergency Medicine, 2013
- Prioritization of Comparative Effectiveness Research Topics in Hospital PediatricsArchives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 2012
- The Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Infants and Children Older Than 3 Months of Age: Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of AmericaClinical Infectious Diseases, 2011
- The Break-Even Point: When Medical Advances Are Less Important Than Improving the Fidelity With Which They Are DeliveredThe Annals of Family Medicine, 2005