Hospital Variability in the Use of Vasoactive Agents in Patients Hospitalized for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: Clinical Phenotypes and Therapeutic Approaches
Preprint
Abstract
Background: The absence of practice standards in vasoactive agent usage for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) has resulted in significant treatment variability across hospitals, potentially affecting patient outcomes. This study aimed to assess temporal trends and institutional differences in vasodilator and inotrope/vasopressor utilization among ADHF patients, considering their clinical phenotypes. Methods: Data were extracted from a government-funded multicenter registry covering the Tokyo metropolitan area, comprising 44,444 consecutive patients urgently hospitalized in intensive/cardiovascular care units with a primary diagnosis of ADHF between 2013 and 2021. Clinical phenotypes, i.e., pulmonary congestion or tissue hypoperfusion, were defined through a comprehensive assessment of clinical signs and symptoms, vital signs, and laboratory findings. We assessed the frequency and temporal trends in phenotype-based drug utilization of vasoactive agents and investigated institutional characteristics associated with adopting the phenotype-based approach. Results: Throughout the study period, both overall and phenotype-based vasodilator utilization showed significant declines, with overall usage dropping from 61.4% in 2013 to 48.6% in 2021 ( p for trend < 0.001). Conversely, no temporal changes were observed in overall inotrope/vasopressor utilization from 24.6% in 2013 to 25.8% in 2021 or the proportion of phenotype-based utilization. Notably, there was considerable variability in phenotype-based drug utilization among hospitals, ranging from 0% to 100%. Particularly, hospitals with a large number of board-certified cardiologists demonstrated reduced phenotype-based vasodilator utilization and phenotypically inappropriate inotrope/vasopressor utilization over time. Conclusions: Substantial variability existed among hospitals in phenotype-based drug utilization of vasoactive agents for ADHF patients, highlighting the need for standardization in their adoption during hospitalization. Key Learning Points: a. What is known: The absence of standardized drug utilization practices for acute decompensated heart failure contributes to notable variations in treatment approaches across different healthcare facilities, and these facility-specific differences have potential to influence patient outcomes. b. What the study adds: This study demonstrated that, using a government-funded multicenter registry of hospitalized patients for acute decompensated heart failure, overall and phenotype-based inotrope/vasopressor utilization was relatively stable between 2013 and 2021, while significant declines in both overall and phenotype-based vasodilator utilization was observed over the same period. Significant variability was noted in the extent of phenotype-based drug utilization among hospitals, with the utilization rates ranging from 0% to 100%: Specifically, hospitals with a large number of board-certified cardiologists demonstrated gradual declines in phenotype-based vasodilator utilization and phenotypically inappropriate utilization of inotropes/vasopressors.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends in Heart Failure Hospitalizations in the US from 2008 to 2018Journal of Cardiac Failure, 2022
- The Heart Failure Association Atlas : Heart Failure Epidemiology and Management Statistics 2019European Journal of Heart Failure, 2021
- Universal definition and classification of heart failure: a report of the Heart Failure Society of America, Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology, Japanese Heart Failure Society and Writing Committee of the Universal Definition of Heart FailureEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2021
- Global Differences in Characteristics, Precipitants, and Initial Management of Patients Presenting With Acute Heart FailureJAMA Cardiology, 2020
- Clinical Phenotypes of Acute Heart Failure Based on Signs and Symptoms of Perfusion and Congestion at Emergency Department Presentation and their Relationship with Patient Management and OutcomesEuropean Journal of Heart Failure, 2019
- National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Guidelines for the Prevention, Detection, and Management of Heart Failure in Australia 2018Heart, Lung and Circulation, 2018
- Impact of Triggering Events on Outcomes of Acute Heart FailureThe American Journal of Medicine, 2018
- Factors associated with variations in hospital expenditures for acute heart failure in the United StatesAmerican Heart Journal, 2015
- Efficacy and safety of high dose versus low dose furosemide with or without dopamine infusion: The Dopamine in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure II (DAD-HF II) TrialInternational Journal of Cardiology, 2014
- Low-Dose Dopamine or Low-Dose Nesiritide in Acute Heart Failure With Renal DysfunctionJAMA, 2013