The Feedback Intervention Trial (FIT) — Improving Hand-Hygiene Compliance in UK Healthcare Workers: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial
Open Access
- 23 October 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 7 (10) , e41617
Abstract
Achieving a sustained improvement in hand-hygiene compliance is the WHO’s first global patient safety challenge. There is no RCT evidence showing how to do this. Systematic reviews suggest feedback is most effective and call for long term well designed RCTs, applying behavioural theory to intervention design to optimise effectiveness. Three year stepped wedge cluster RCT of a feedback intervention testing hypothesis that the intervention was more effective than routine practice in 16 English/Welsh Hospitals (16 Intensive Therapy Units [ITU]; 44 Acute Care of the Elderly [ACE] wards) routinely implementing a national cleanyourhands campaign). Intervention-based on Goal & Control theories. Repeating 4 week cycle (20 mins/week) of observation, feedback and personalised action planning, recorded on forms. Computer-generated stepwise entry of all hospitals to intervention. Hospitals aware only of own allocation. Primary outcome: direct blinded hand hygiene compliance (%). All 16 trusts (60 wards) randomised, 33 wards implemented intervention (11 ITU, 22 ACE). Mixed effects regression analysis (all wards) accounting for confounders, temporal trends, ward type and fidelity to intervention (forms/month used). Estimated odds ratio (OR) for hand hygiene compliance rose post randomisation (1.44; 95% CI 1.18, 1.76;p<0.001) in ITUs but not ACE wards, equivalent to 7–9% absolute increase in compliance. OR for compliance rose for both ACE (1.67 [1.28–2.22]; p<0.001) & ITUs (2.09 [1.55–2.81];p<0.001) equating to absolute increases of 10–13% and 13–18% respectively. Fidelity to intervention closely related to compliance on ITUs (OR 1.12 [1.04, 1.20];p = 0.003 per completed form) but not ACE wards. Despite difficulties in implementation, intention-to-treat, per-protocol and fidelity to intervention, analyses showed an intervention coupling feedback to personalised action planning produced moderate but significant sustained improvements in hand-hygiene compliance, in wards implementing a national hand-hygiene campaign. Further implementation studies are needed to maximise the intervention’s effect in different settings. Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN65246961Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluation of the national Cleanyourhands campaign to reduce Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and Clostridium difficile infection in hospitals in England and Wales by improved hand hygiene: four year, prospective, ecological, interrupted time series studyBMJ, 2012
- Using theory to synthesise evidence from behaviour change interventions: The example of audit and feedbackSocial Science & Medicine, 2010
- Systematic Review of Studies on Compliance with Hand Hygiene Guidelines in Hospital CareInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2010
- The Role of Behavioral Science Theory in Development and Implementation of Public Health InterventionsAnnual Review of Public Health, 2010
- From Theory to Intervention: Mapping Theoretically Derived Behavioural Determinants to Behaviour Change TechniquesApplied Psychology, 2008
- Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes2006
- P10.09 Development of an Intervention to Increase UK NHS Healthcare Worker Hand-hygiene Behaviour Using Psychological TheoryJournal of Hospital Infection, 2006
- Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approachQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2005
- The effectiveness of interventions aimed at increasing handwashing in healthcare workers - a systematic reviewJournal of Hospital Infection, 2001
- A Theory of Goal Setting and Task PerformanceAcademy of Management Review, 1991