Development and validation of a risk prediction model for re-tear after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair
Authors:
Open Access
- 5 November 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-9
Abstract
Re-tear remains a frequent complication after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR), adversely affecting functional recovery. This study aimed to develop and validate a clinical prediction model for re-tear risk following ARCR. This retrospective study included 570 patients undergoing ARCR from 2018 to 2023, randomly assigned to training (n = 399) and validation (n = 171) cohorts. Demographic, imaging, and intraoperative variables were analyzed. Independent predictors from multivariable logistic regression were used to construct a nomogram. Model performance was assessed by discrimination, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Six independent predictors were identified: age, maximal tear diameter, Patte grade III tendon retraction, high-grade fatty infiltration (Goutallier ≥ 3), positive tangent sign, and intraoperative repair tension. The nomogram showed good discrimination (AUC = 0.76 training; 0.74 validation) and calibration (Hosmer–Lemeshow P = 0.735 and 0.721, respectively). DCA demonstrated clinical utility across wide threshold probabilities, outperforming “treat-all” and “treat-none” strategies. This nomogram, integrating preoperative imaging and intraoperative findings, provides individualized re-tear risk estimates after ARCR, offering a practical tool for surgical planning and patient counseling.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predictive Factors of Rotator Cuff Retear After Arthroscopic Repair Based on Preoperative Shoulder UltrasonographyJournal of Clinical Ultrasound, 2025
- A modified Patte classification system for rotator cuff tendon retraction to predict reparability and tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repairKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2024
- Increased HbA1c Levels in Diabetics During the Postoperative 3‐6 Months After Rotator Cuff Repair Correlated With Increased Retear RatesArthroscopy, 2022
- Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Results in Lower Two‐Year Reoperation Rates Compared With Open Rotator Cuff Repair in a Large Cross‐sectional CohortArthroscopy, Sports Medicine, and Rehabilitation, 2021
- Primary arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears results in significant improvements with low rate of re‐tearKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2020
- Assessment of Tendon Retraction in Large to Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Modified Patte Classification Based on 2 Coronal Sections on Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Higher Specificity on Predicting ReparabilityArthroscopy, 2020
- How Much Will High Tension Adversely Affect Rotator Cuff Repair Integrity?Arthroscopy, 2019
- Comparable clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in diabetic and non‐diabetic patientsKnee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2018
- Clinical and Structural Outcomes After Arthroscopic Repair of Full‐Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears With and Without Platelet‐Rich Product Supplementation: A Meta‐analysis and Meta‐regressionArthroscopy, 2014
- Functional Outcome After Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears in Individuals With PseudoparalysisArthroscopy, 2012