What factors influence ratings of Global Perceived Effect by individuals with low back pain and physiotherapists?
Open Access
- 12 June 2026
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The Journal of Pain
- Vol. 46, 106348
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research (165952)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (2042003)
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient values in physiotherapy practice, a qualitative studyPhysiotherapy Research International, 2020
- Psychometric properties of the global rating of change scales in patients with low back pain, upper and lower extremity disorders. A systematic review with meta-analysisJournal of Orthopaedics, 2020
- EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and FutureApplied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2017
- Establishing clinically meaningful severity levels for the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK‐13)European journal of pain, 2015
- Self‐efficacy is more important than fear of movement in mediating the relationship between pain and disability in chronic low back painEuropean journal of pain, 2011
- The patient-specific functional scale is more responsive than the Roland Morris disability questionnaire when activity limitation is lowEuropean Spine Journal, 2010
- Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current statusJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2010
- Identification of prognostic factors for chronicity in patients with low back pain: a review of screening instrumentsInternational Orthopaedics, 2009
- Recovery: What does this mean to patients with low back pain?Arthritis Care & Research, 2008
- The Validity of Prospective and Retrospective Global Change Criterion MeasuresArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2005