Tobacco industry marketing to low socioeconomic status women in the USA
Authors:
- 21 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Tobacco Control
- Vol. 23 (e2) , e139-e146
Abstract
Objectives Describe tobacco companies' marketing strategies targeting low socioeconomic status (SES) females in the USA. Methods Analysis of previously secret tobacco industry documents. Results Tobacco companies focused marketing on low SES women starting in the late 1970s, including military wives, low-income inner-city minority women, ‘discount-susceptible’ older female smokers and less-educated young white women. Strategies included distributing discount coupons with food stamps to reach the very poor, discount offers at point-of-sale and via direct mail to keep cigarette prices low, developing new brands for low SES females and promoting luxury images to low SES African-American women. More recently, companies integrated promotional strategies targeting low-income women into marketing plans for established brands. Conclusions Tobacco companies used numerous marketing strategies to reach low SES females in the USA for at least four decades. Strategies to counteract marketing to low SES women could include (1) counteracting price discounts and direct mail coupons that reduce the price of tobacco products, (2) instituting restrictions on point-of-sale advertising and retail display and (3) creating counteradvertising that builds resistance to psychosocial targeting of low SES women. To achieve health equity, tobacco control efforts are needed to counteract the influence of tobacco industry marketing to low-income women.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Menthol: putting the pieces togetherTobacco Control, 2011
- Menthol cigarettes and smoking initiation: a tobacco industry perspectiveTobacco Control, 2011
- Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions: a review of tobacco industry documentsTobacco Control, 2011
- Tobacco documents research methodologyTobacco Control, 2011
- Public support in England for raising the price of cigarettes to fund tobacco control activities: Figure 1Tobacco Control, 2010
- Mobilising public opinion for the tobacco industry: the consumer tax alliance and excise taxesTobacco Control, 2008
- Political coalitions and working women: how the tobacco industry built a relationship with the Coalition of Labor Union WomenJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2006
- Playing hide‐and‐seek with the tobacco industryNicotine & Tobacco Research, 2005
- Smoking, social class, and gender: what can public health learn from the tobacco industry about disparities in smoking?: Figure 1Tobacco Control, 2004
- Smoking and WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987