Sex-Gender Differences in the Effectiveness of Treatment of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Systematic Review
Authors:
- Lente van KesselLKLente van Kessel
- Doreth TeunissenDTDoreth Teunissen
- Toine Lagro-JanssenTLToine Lagro-Janssen
Open Access
- 1 March 2021
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in International Journal of General Medicine
- Vol. ume 14, 867-884
Abstract
Background: In recent years, research on sex-gender differences in health care has increasingly recognized that men and women differ in the way symptoms occur, in risk factors for certain conditions and in the way they respond to the same treatment. A disease that is known to often present differently in women and men is irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Given the difference in prevalence, predominant symptoms and possible other pathophysiology, it is conceivable that a difference in treatment effectiveness in men and women is a discovery waiting to be found. Purpose: To determine whether there are differences in treatment effectiveness between men and women with irritable bowel syndrome. Materials and Methods: We searched on PubMed and EMBASE, selecting randomized controlled trials comparing IBS treatment in men and women over 18 years old. One researcher performed the inclusion process, and two researchers independently performed a quality assessment. A descriptive analysis was conducted. Results: Twelve studies, randomizing 1847 men and 3562 women, were included in this review. Treatment with serotonin antagonist alosetron, treatment with ibodutant and crofelemer and adding cognitive behavioral therapy to medical treatment found significant differences between men and women in favor of effectiveness towards women in either satisfactory relief of overall IBS symptoms or percentage of pain-free days. Conclusion: Sex-gender can be a determining factor in the effectiveness of IBS treatment. Due to the limited number of studies per treatment option, no recommendations can be made on the choice of a specific treatment. It is clear, however, that so as not to miss beneficial treatment options for either sex, the inclusion, analysis and description of data on the basis of sex is of the utmost importance.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trialsBMJ, 2011
- Randomised clinical trial: the safety and efficacy of AST-120 in non-constipating irritable bowel syndrome - a double-blind, placebo-controlled studyAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2011
- Metabonomic Understanding of Probiotic Effects in Humans With Irritable Bowel SyndromeJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 2011
- Sex Differences in Pharmacokinetics and PharmacodynamicsClinical Pharmacokinetics, 2009
- Alexithymia and Somatization in General PopulationPsychosomatic Medicine, 2008
- A Phase II Trial of the Novel Serotonin Type 3 Receptor Antagonist Ramosetron in Japanese Male and Female Patients with Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel SyndromeDigestion, 2008
- Evaluation of Crofelemer in the Treatment of Diarrhea-Predominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome PatientsDigestion, 2008
- Clinical trial: renzapride therapy for constipation‐predominant irritable bowel syndrome – multicentre, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind study in primary healthcare settingAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2008
- Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic reviewBMJ, 2003
- Improvement in pain and bowel function in female irritable bowel patients with alosetron, a 5‐HT3 receptor antagonistAlimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1999