Residency selection: do the perceptions of US programme directors and applicants match?
Open Access
- 20 April 2012
- journal article
- making choices
- Published by Wiley in Medical Education
- Vol. 46 (5) , 491-500
Abstract
Medical Education 2012: 46 : 491–500 Objectives This study sought to evaluate the practices and perceptions of US residency programme directors (PDs) and residency applicants with reference to the use of social media and Internet resources in the resident doctor selection process. Methods A survey was distributed via e‐mail (SurveyMonkey ® ) to 2592 PDs of programmes in 22 specialties accredited by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. A separate survey was distributed to all residency candidates applying for postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) positions at the Saint Barnabas Medical Center, Livingston, New Jersey. Results A total of 1200 (46.3%) PDs completed the survey. Overall, 16.3% ( n = 196) of respondents reported visiting Internet resources to gain more information about applicants, 38.1% (74 of 194) of whom had ranked an applicant lower as a result. American medical graduates (AMGs), US international medical graduates (USIMGs) and non‐USIMGs all felt that performance on Step 1 of the US Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) was a critical aspect of a residency application. More AMGs than USIMGs and non‐USIMGs believed that PDs made use of social media resources when evaluating applicants and that their online profiles might influence their rankings. Conclusions Residency candidates universally understand the importance of USMLE Step 1 scores in maintaining a competitive application. However, significant differences exist among AMGs, USIMGs and non‐USIMGs in their perceptions of the value of other applicant criteria, which may place some applicants at a disadvantage. A small but growing number of PDs currently use Internet resources to learn more about applicants and base their recruitment decisions in part on the information they encounter. At present, applicants are generally unaware of the implications their online activity may have on their selection for residency. Content guideline programmes that raise awareness of the possible impact of social media on the residency recruitment process are needed and should be delivered early in medical education.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of social media by residency program directors for resident selectionAmerican Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 2010
- Itʼs Your Own Risk: Medical Studentsʼ Perspectives on Online ProfessionalismAcademic Medicine, 2010
- Privacy, professionalism and Facebook: a dilemma for young doctorsMedical Education, 2010
- Online Posting of Unprofessional Content by Medical StudentsJAMA, 2009
- Integrated Plastic Surgery Residency Applicant Survey: Characteristics of Successful Applicants and Feedback about the Interview ProcessPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 2009
- Selection Criteria for Residency: Results of a National Program Directors SurveyAcademic Medicine, 2009
- The Intersection of Online Social Networking with Medical ProfessionalismJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2008
- Does US Medical Licensing Examination Step l Score Really Matter in Surgical Residency Match Outcomes (and Should It)?Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 2008
- Key Criteria for Selection of Radiology ResidentsAcademic Radiology, 2006
- Program directorsʼ responses to a survey on variables used to select residents in a time of changeAcademic Medicine, 1999