Comparing the Mechanical and Thermodynamic Definitions of Pressure in Ice Nucleation
Open Access
- 12 February 2026
- journal article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
- Vol. 17 (8) , 2367-2373
Abstract
Crystal nucleation studies using hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones models have shown that the actual (mechanical) pressure within the nucleus is lower than that in the surrounding liquid. Here, we use the mechanical route to obtain the pressure for an ice nucleus in supercooled water (TIP4P/Ice) at 1 bar and 247 K. From this pressure, we obtain the interfacial stress using a thermodynamic definition consistent with mechanical arguments. Moreover, we compare the mechanical pressure with the thermodynamic pressure of bulk ice at an equal chemical potential and the interfacial stress with the interfacial free energy. Furthermore, we investigate these properties on the basal plane. We find that unlike in hard-sphere and Lennard-Jones systems, mechanical and thermodynamic pressures agree for the nucleus, and the interfacial stress and free energy are comparable. However, the basal interface displays an interfacial stress nearly twice its interfacial free energy, suggesting that this agreement may be dependent on the system, underscoring the limitations of mechanical routes to solid-liquid interfacial free energies.Keywords
Funding Information
- University at Buffalo
- Austrian Science Fund (10.55776/F81)
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ice Nucleation Regulation by Nanoscale Surface TopographyThe Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 2025
- Solid–Liquid Interfacial Free Energy from Computer Simulations: Challenges and Recent AdvancesChemical Reviews, 2025
- Atomistic Simulation Study of the FCC and BCC Crystal-Melt Interface StressesSurfaces and Interfaces, 2022
- Microscopic Pressure Tensor in Cylindrical Geometry: Pressure of Water in a Carbon NanotubeJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2020
- Interfacial Free Energy and Tolman Length of Curved Liquid–Solid Interfaces from Equilibrium StudiesThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2020
- Pressure Profile Calculation with Mesh Ewald MethodsJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 2016
- Ice–Water Interfacial Free Energy for the TIP4P, TIP4P/2005, TIP4P/Ice, and mW Models As Obtained from the Mold Integration TechniqueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2016
- Atomistic simulations of the Fe(001)–Li solid–liquid interfaceFusion Engineering and Design, 2014
- Atomistic characterization of the chemically heterogeneous Al–Pb solid–liquid interfaceActa Materialia, 2012
- Comments on the article entitled “Incompatibility of the Shuttleworth equation with Hermann’s mathematical structure of thermodynamics” by D.J. Bottomley et al.Surface Science, 2009