Compound eyes and retinal information processing in miniature dipteran species match their specific ecological demands
- 22 February 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by National Academy of Sciences in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 108 (10) , 4224-4229
Abstract
The compound eye of insects imposes a tradeoff between resolution and sensitivity, which should exacerbate with diminishing eye size. Tiny lenses are thought to deliver poor acuity because of diffraction; nevertheless, miniature insects have visual systems that allow a myriad of lifestyles. Here, we investigate whether size constraints result in an archetypal eye design shared between miniature dipterans by comparing the visual performance of the fruit fly Drosophila and the killer fly Coenosia. These closely related species have neural superposition eyes and similar body lengths (3 to 4 mm), but Coenosia is a diurnal aerial predator, whereas slow-flying Drosophila is most active at dawn and dusk. Using in vivo intracellular recordings and EM, we report unique adaptations in the form and function of their photoreceptors that are reflective of their distinct lifestyles. We find that although these species have similar lenses and optical properties, Coenosia photoreceptors have three- to fourfold higher spatial resolution and rate of information transfer than Drosophila. The higher performance in Coenosia mostly results from dramatically diminished light sensors, or rhabdomeres, which reduce pixel size and optical cross-talk between photoreceptors and incorporate accelerated phototransduction reactions. Furthermore, we identify local specializations in the Coenosia eye, consistent with an acute zone and its predatory lifestyle. These results demonstrate how the flexible architecture of miniature compound eyes can evolve to match information processing with ecological demands.Keywords
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- A `bright zone' in male hoverfly (Eristalis tenax) eyes and associated faster motion detection and increased contrast sensitivityJournal of Experimental Biology, 2006
- Feedback Network Controls Photoreceptor Output at the Layer of First Visual Synapses in Drosophila Journal of General Physiology, 2006
- The Rate of Information Transfer of Naturalistic Stimulation by Graded PotentialsJournal of General Physiology, 2003
- Light Adaptation in Drosophila PhotoreceptorsJournal of General Physiology, 2000
- VISUAL ACUITY IN INSECTSAnnual Review of Entomology, 1997
- Arthropod eye design and the physical limits to spatial resolving powerProgress in Neurobiology, 1993
- Synaptic organization of columnar elements in the lamina of the wild type in Drosophila melanogasterJournal of Comparative Neurology, 1991
- The intracellular pupil mechanism and photoreceptor signal: noise ratios in the fly Lucilia cuprinaProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1987
- Transduction as a limitation on compound eye function and designProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1983
- Fly photoreceptors. III. Angular sensitivity as a function of wavelength and the limits of resolutionProceedings of the Royal Society of London. B. Biological Sciences, 1976