Likelihood ratios for continuous test results—making the clinicians' job easier or harder?
Authors:
- Gregory P. SamsaGSGregory P. Samsa
- David B. MatcharDMDavid B. Matchar
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 46 (1) , 85-93
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laboratory diagnosis of iron-deficiency anemiaJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1992
- The logistic modeling of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value of a diagnostic testJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1992
- Diagnostic tests are not always black or white: Or, all that glitters is not 6A9 gold 6standard9Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test ResultsMedical Decision Making, 1987
- Impaired Immunogenicity of Hepatitis B Vaccine in Obese PersonsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- The cerebrospinal fluid immunoglobulin G index as a diagnostic aid in multiple sclerosis: a Bayesian approach.Clinical Chemistry, 1982