The National Practitioner Data Bank
Authors:
- Fitzhugh MullanFMFitzhugh Mullan
- Robert M. PolitzerRPRobert M. Politzer
- Caroline T. LewisCLCaroline T. Lewis
- Stanford BastackySBStanford Bastacky
- John RodakJRJohn Rodak
- Robert G. HarmonRHRobert G. Harmon
- 1 July 1992
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 268 (1) , 73-79
Abstract
MEDICAL incompetence is a twofold problem for this nation's citizens. It subjects patients to unwarranted risks and poor outcomes, and it contributes to higher payments for health care owing to increased liability awards and premiums with the consequent practice of "defensive" medicine.1-3In addition, it interferes with the availability of necessary medical services.4-6Currently, these issues are being discussed as part of the debate surrounding reform of the health care system in the United States. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act (HCQIA) of 1986, however, established a legal base and a national reporting system intended to improve the ability of the health professions to police themselves.7The act's principal program, the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB), is designed to collect comprehensive data on adverse actions taken against and malpractice payments made on behalf of practitioners and make them available to credentialing authorities. The NPDB opened on SeptemberKeywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Congress Moves to Bolster Peer Review: the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986New England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- Antitrust Law versus Peer ReviewNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985