Subject Islands, Reconstruction, and the Flow of the Computation
Authors:
- 1 October 2014
- journal article
- Published by MIT Press in Linguistic Inquiry
- Vol. 45 (4) , 525-569
Abstract
Recent research has highlighted a remarkable variability in subject island effects. Focusing on intransitive verbs and adjectives, we argue that islandhood is determined at the syntax-semantics interface: subjects qualify as islands when they are interpreted outside the predicative nucleus of the clause, in a categorical LF structure ( Ladusaw 1994 ); they are transparent for extraction when they undergo total reconstruction into the predicative nucleus, giving rise to a thetic structure. The thetic/categorical interpretation depends on various factors (most notably the stage-level versus individual-level nature of the predicate), whose interaction accounts for the observed variability of island effects, as shown by our experimental evidence. The relevance of subject reconstruction need not be stipulated; rather, it follows from a top-down-oriented computation, in which movement dependencies are implemented by a storage-and-retrieval mechanism.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The End of CED? Minimalism and Extraction DomainsSyntax, 2007
- Total Reconstruction, PF Movement, and Derivational OrderLinguistic Inquiry, 2002
- The Subject-in-Situ Generalization and the Role of Case in Driving ComputationsLinguistic Inquiry, 2001
- “Postverbal” Subjects and the Mapping HypothesisLinguistic Inquiry, 2000
- Cyclicity and Extraction DomainsSyntax, 2000
- Derivational minimalism1997
- On the controversial status of Romance interrogativesProbus, 1996
- Additional-wh effects and the adjunction site theoryJournal of East Asian Linguistics, 1994
- Tree adjoining grammars: How much context-sensitivity is required to provide reasonable structural descriptions?1985
- Amount RelativesLanguage, 1977