A Multidimensionality-Based DIF Analysis Paradigm
Authors:
- 1 December 1996
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Applied Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 20 (4) , 355-371
Abstract
A multidimensionality-based differential item func tioning (DIF) analysis paradigm is presented that unifies the substantive and statistical DIF analysis approaches by linking both to a theoretically sound and mathematically rigorous multidimensional conceptualization of DIF. This paradigm has the potential (1) to improve under standing of the causes of DIF by formulating and testing substantive dimensionality-based DIF hypotheses; (2) to reduce Type 1 error through a better understanding of the possible multidimensionality of an appropriate matching criterion; and (3) to increase power through the testing of bundles of items measuring similar dimen sions. Using this approach, DIF analysis is shown to have the potential for greater integration in the overall test development process.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Item‐Bundle DIF Hypothesis Testing: Identifying Suspect Bundles and Assessing Their Differential FunctioningJournal of Educational Measurement, 1996
- Detecting Calculator Effects on Item PerformanceApplied Measurement in Education, 1992
- A Didactic Explanation of Item Bias, Item Impact, and Item Validity From a Multidimensional PerspectiveJournal of Educational Measurement, 1992
- Accuracy of Bias Review Judges in Identifying Differential Item Functioning on Teacher Certification TestsApplied Measurement in Education, 1990
- Item Bias and Test Multidimensionality1988
- Gender‐Based Differential Item Performance in Mathematics Achievement ItemsJournal of Educational Measurement, 1987
- Evolving Concepts of Test ValidationAnnual Review of Psychology, 1986
- Construct validity: Construct representation versus nomothetic span.Psychological Bulletin, 1983
- Bias in testing.American Psychologist, 1981
- Construct validity in psychological tests.Psychological Bulletin, 1955