CONSTRAINING THE PREFERRED-FRAME α1, α2PARAMETERS FROM SOLAR SYSTEM PLANETARY PRECESSIONS
Author:
- 2 January 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by World Scientific Pub Co Pte Ltd in International Journal of Modern Physics D
- Vol. 23 (01)
Abstract
Analytical expressions for the orbital precessions affecting the relative motion of the components of a local binary system induced by Lorentz-violating Preferred Frame Effects (PFE) are explicitly computed in terms of the Parametrized Post-Newtonian (PPN) parameters α1, α2. Preliminary constraints on α1, α2are inferred from the latest determinations of the observationally admitted ranges [ ] for any anomalous Solar System planetary perihelion precessions. Other bounds existing in the literature are critically reviewed, with particular emphasis on the constraint [ ] based on an interpretation of the current close alignment of the Sun's equator with the invariable plane of the Solar System in terms of the action of a α2-induced torque throughout the entire Solar System's existence. Taken individually, the supplementary precessions [ ] of Earth and Mercury, recently determined with the INPOP10a ephemerides without modeling PFE, yield α1= (0.8±4) × 10-6and α2= (4±6) × 10-6, respectively. A linear combination of the supplementary perihelion precessions of all the inner planets of the Solar System, able to remove the a priori bias of unmodeled/mismodeled standard effects such as the general relativistic Lense–Thirring precessions and the classical rates due to the Sun's oblateness J2, allows to infer α1= (-1 ± 6) × 10-6, α2= (-0.9 ± 3.5) × 10-5. Such figures are obtained by assuming that the ranges of values for the anomalous perihelion precessions are entirely due to the unmodeled effects of α1and α2. Our bounds should be improved in the near-mid future with the MESSENGER and, especially, BepiColombo spacecrafts. Nonetheless, it is worthwhile noticing that our constraints are close to those predicted for BepiColombo in two independent studies. In further dedicated planetary analyses, PFE may be explicitly modeled to estimate α1, α2simultaneously with the other PPN parameters as well.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 76 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constraints on dark matter in the solar systemAstronomy Letters, 2013
- A Specific Case of Generalized Einstein-aether TheoriesCommunications in Theoretical Physics, 2012
- The INPOP10a planetary ephemeris and its applications in fundamental physicsCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2011
- A characteristic observable signature of preferred-frame effects in relativistic binary pulsarsMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 2007
- Report of the IAU/IAG Working Group on cartographic coordinates and rotational elements: 2006Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2007
- Future gravitational physics tests from ranging to the BepiColombo Mercury planetary orbiterPhysical Review D, 2007
- Standard Model extension with gravity and gravitational baryogenesisPhysics Letters B, 2006
- Lorentz Violation in Supersymmetric Field TheoriesPhysical Review Letters, 2005
- Long-Term Evolution of Orbits About A Precessing Oblate Planet: 1. The Case of Uniform PrecessionCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 2005
- Analytical methods for the orbits of artificial satellites of the MoonCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, 1971