Anthropometric Models to Predict Appendicular Lean Soft Tissue in Adolescent Athletes
Authors:
- Elvis A. CarneroECElvis A. Carnero
- Analiza M. SilvaASAnaliza M. Silva
- Brianna C. BrightBBBrianna C. Bright
- Luis B. SardinhaLSLuis B. Sardinha
- 1 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Vol. 41 (4) , 828-836
Abstract
Skeletal muscle (SM), which is found mainly within the appendicular lean soft tissue (ALST) compartment, is a biological important body compartment. Simple and accurate methods to estimate both SM and ALST remain difficult to obtain. We aimed to develop and to cross-validate anthropometric models for ALST in athletes, using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) as the reference method. ALST equations were developed in 176 athletic boys (15.0 +/- 2.8 yr; 64.5 +/- 15.8 kg; 1.72 +/- 0.15 m) and 92 athletic girls (14.6 +/- 2.8 yr; 53.0 +/- 13.1 kg; 1.61 +/- 0.13 m). Skinfolds were measured at the triceps, the thigh, and medial calf, and circumferences were measured at the midupper arm, the midthigh, and the midcalf. ALST was assessed using DXA (QDR-4500; Hologic, Walthman, MA; fan-beam mode). Two models were developed: a body weight model (WHt model) and a corrected muscle girth model (CMG model, which included the parameters height x CAG, height x CTG, and height x CCG, where CAG is corrected arm girth, CTG is corrected thigh girth, and CCG is the corrected calf). Simple regression analysis was used to identify the best model fit. The equations were internally cross-validated using the predicted residual sum of squares method, and performance of new equations was analyzed by regression analysis and agreement between methods. The new WHt model generated the following equation: ALST = -20.338 + 0.199(W) + 3.294(gender) + 14.230(height) + 0.192(age), where gender = 1 for male and 0 for female. The CMG model produced the following equation: ALST = 3.260 + 0.002(height x CTG) + 0.007(height x CAG) + 0.003(height x CCG). WHt equation had an R = 0.91 and an SEE = 2.00 kg, whereas CMG equation presented an R = 0.93 and an SEE = 1.80 kg. In both equations, slopes and intercepts did not differ from the line of identity; no mean differences between predicted and measured values and no trend line were observed (P > 0.05). Both models accurately predict ALST in young athletes, affording a practical means to quantify this compartment.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Anthropometry profiles of elite rugby players: quantifying changes in lean massBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2006
- Skinfold Prediction Equation for Athletes Developed Using a Four-Component ModelMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2005
- A follow-up study of the variations in the body composition of karate athletesActa Diabetologica, 2003
- Effects of different sports on bone density and muscle mass in highly trained athletesMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2001
- Body proportions, body composition and pubertal development of children in competitive sportsScandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports, 2001
- A New Formula for Population-Based Estimation of Whole Body Muscle Mass in MalesCanadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 1997
- Assessment of the composition of major body regions by dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA), with special reference to limb muscle massClinical Physiology and Functional Imaging, 1992
- STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENTThe Lancet, 1986
- Anthropometric measurement of muscle mass: revised equations for calculating bone-free arm muscle areaThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1982
- Arm anthropometry in nutritional assessment: nomogram for rapid calculation of muscle circumference and cross-sectional muscle and fat areasThe American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1973