Peer assessment in MOOCs: Systematic literature review
- 3 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Distance Education
- Vol. 42 (2) , 268-289
Abstract
We report on a systematic review of the landscape of peer assessment in massive open online courses (MOOCs) with papers from 2014 to 2020 in 20 leading education technology publication venues across four databases containing education technology–related papers, addressing three research issues: the evolution of peer assessment in MOOCs during the period 2014 to 2020, the methods used in MOOCs to assess peers, and the challenges of and future directions in MOOC peer assessment. We provide summary statistics and a review of methods across the corpus and highlight three directions for improving the use of peer assessment in MOOCs: the need for focusing on scaling learning through peer evaluations, the need for scaling and optimizing team submissions in team peer assessments, and the need for embedding a social process for peer assessment.Keywords
This publication has 52 references indexed in Scilit:
- A factorization approach to evaluate open-response assignments in MOOCs using preference learning on peer assessmentsKnowledge-Based Systems, 2015
- Do Numeric Ratings Impact Peer Reviewers?2015
- Methods for ordinal peer grading2014
- Peer evaluation of student generated content2014
- Scaling short-answer grading by combining peer assessment with algorithmic scoring2014
- Peer and self assessment in massive online classesACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 2013
- The pedagogical foundations of massive open online coursesFirst Monday, 2013
- Learning by reviewing.Journal of Educational Psychology, 2011
- Learning from and with peersACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 2009
- Designing Project-Based Courses with a Focus on Group Formation and AssessmentACM Transactions on Computing Education, 2009