Uncovering Protein Ensembles: Automated Multiconformer Model Building for X- ray Crystallography and Cryo-EM
Authors:
- Stephanie A. WankowiczSWStephanie A. Wankowicz
- Ashraya RavikumarARAshraya Ravikumar
- Shivani SharmaSSShivani Sharma
- Blake T. RileyBRBlake T. Riley
- Akshay RajuARAkshay Raju
- Jessica FlowersJFJessica Flowers
- Daniel W. HoganDHDaniel W. Hogan
- Henry van Den BedemHBHenry van Den Bedem
- Daniel A. KeedyDKDaniel A. Keedy
- James S. FraserJFJames S. Fraser
Preprint
- 14 May 2024
- preprint
- Published by eLife Sciences Publications, Ltd in eLife preprints
- Vol. 12
Abstract
In their folded state, biomolecules exchange between multiple conformational states that are crucial for their function. Traditional structural biology methods, such as X-ray crystallography and cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM), produce density maps that are ensemble averages, reflecting molecules in various conformations. Yet, most models derived from these maps explicitly represent only a single conformation, overlooking the complexity of biomolecular structures. To accurately reflect the diversity of biomolecular forms, there is a pressing need to shift towards modeling structural ensembles that mirror the experimental data. However, the challenge of distinguishing signal from noise complicates manual efforts to create these models. In response, we introduce the latest enhancements to qFit, an automated computational strategy designed to incorporate protein conformational heterogeneity into models built into density maps. These algorithmic improvements in qFit are substantiated by superior Rfree and geometry metrics across a wide range of proteins. Importantly, unlike more complex multicopy ensemble models, the multiconformer models produced by qFit can be manually modified in most major model building software (e.g. Coot) and fit can be further improved by refinement using standard pipelines (e.g. Phenix, Refmac, Buster). By reducing the barrier of creating multiconformer models, qFit can foster the development of new hypotheses about the relationship between macromolecular conformational dynamics and function.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electron microscopy holdings of the Protein Data Bank: the impact of the resolution revolution, new validation tools, and implications for the futureBiophysical Reviews, 2022
- qFit 3: Protein and ligand multiconformer modeling for X‐ray crystallographic and single‐particle cryo‐EM density mapsProtein Science, 2020
- MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all‐atom structure validationProtein Science, 2017
- Flexibility and Design: Conformational Heterogeneity along the Evolutionary Trajectory of a Redesigned UbiquitinStructure, 2017
- Single-Particle Cryo-EM at Crystallographic ResolutionCell, 2015
- Multiscale Conformational Heterogeneity in Staphylococcal Protein A: Possible Determinant of Functional PlasticityStructure, 2014
- E pluribus unum, no more: from one crystal, many conformationsCurrent Opinion in Structural Biology, 2014
- Why protein R‐factors are so large: A self‐consistent analysisProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2002
- The penultimate rotamer libraryProteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics, 2000
- CATH – a hierarchic classification of protein domain structuresStructure, 1997