Cost‐effective alternatives for mitigating Cryptosporidium risk in drinking water and enhancing ecosystem services
- 27 August 2009
- journal article
- Published by American Geophysical Union (AGU) in Water Resources Research
- Vol. 45 (8)
Abstract
Under the multibarrier paradigm, water quality management barriers that mitigate risk to consumers are required at multiple points from the catchment to the tap. We present a cost‐effectiveness analysis of 13 catchment‐ and treatment‐based management alternatives for mitigating Cryptosporidium risk in the Myponga water supply catchment, South Australia. A broad range of costs and benefits are identified and valued, including setup, operation and maintenance, and opportunity costs, and benefits for ecosystem services including water quality, biodiversity, carbon sequestration, and farm production services. The results suggest that the cost‐effectiveness of investment in water quality management can be substantially enhanced by considering the costs of management and the benefits for ecosystem services, in addition to Cryptosporidium removal effectiveness. Cost‐effectiveness of investment in management alternatives is dependent upon the desired level of Cryptosporidium removal effectiveness by both the catchment and treatment barriers. The combination of a spatially targeted 25% restriction in water course access of nondairy cattle and treatment by enhanced coagulation provides the most (net) cost‐effective Cryptosporidium risk mitigation strategy. This combination may achieve 0.614 log removal at a net cost of A$0.7 million and (net) cost‐effectiveness of A$1.14 million per log removal. Additional risk mitigation can be achieved through the addition of ultraviolet irradiation treatment, higher levels of water course access restriction for cattle, and the adoption of dung beetles in the catchment. Economic valuation of a range of costs and benefits of management priorities can support cost‐effective water quality management investment decisions and inform elements of policy design such as cost‐sharing arrangements and spatial targeting.Keywords
This publication has 54 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adaptive management for mitigating Cryptosporidium risk in source water: A case study in an agricultural catchment in South AustraliaJournal of Environmental Management, 2009
- Designing, testing and implementing a trial dryland salinity credit trade schemeEcological Economics, 2008
- Adoption of Stream Fencing Among Dairy Farmers in Four New Zealand CatchmentsEnvironmental Management, 2007
- Analysing the Agricultural Costs and Non‐market Benefits of Implementing the Water Framework DirectiveJournal of Agricultural Economics, 2006
- Phosphorus, Sediment, and Escherichia coli Loads in Unfenced Streams of the Georgia Piedmont, USAJournal of Environmental Quality, 2005
- Drinking water treatment processes for removal of Cryptosporidium and GiardiaVeterinary Parasitology, 2004
- Grass Barrier and Vegetative Filter Strip Effectiveness in Reducing Runoff, Sediment, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus LossSoil Science Society of America Journal, 2004
- Fate and transport of pathogens in lakes and reservoirsEnvironment International, 2004
- Costs of Illness in the 1993 WaterborneCryptosporidiumOutbreak, Milwaukee, WisconsinEmerging Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Economic returns from the biosphereNature, 1998