PENSIONS AND WAGE PREMIA
- 1 July 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Economic Inquiry
- Vol. 35 (3) , 510-522
Abstract
We hypothesize that the magnitude of the pension‐wage compensating differential should vary by sector, because sectoral differences in firms ‘technologies result in cost differences in providing non‐wage benefits’. Using data from the Survey of Consumer Finances, we find that the pension‐wage compensating differential is smaller in the union sector and large firms than in small, nonunion firms. Controls for sectoral selectivity do not alter the results. Thus, workers at unionized and large firms pay a lower implicit price for their pensions either because pensions have productivity‐enhancing effects, or because these firms pay workers economic rents via pensions. (JEL 532, J31, 541)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pensions and Wages: An Hedonic Price Theory ApproachInternational Economic Review, 1992
- The Gender Gap in Pensions and WagesReview of Economics and Statistics, 1990
- Workers' Trust Funds and the Logic of Wage ProfilesThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1989
- Labor Market Segmentation and the Union Wage PremiumReview of Economics and Statistics, 1988
- ARE MALE/FEMALE EARNINGS DIFFERENTIALS RELATED TO LIFE‐EXPECTANCY‐CAUSED PENSION COST DIFFERENCES?Economic Inquiry, 1987
- Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Estimating Demand and Supply Functions for Differentiated ProductsJournal of Political Economy, 1987
- The Endogeneity of Union Status: An Empirical TestJournal of Labor Economics, 1985
- HETEROGENEOUS FIRMS AND THE ORGANIZATION OF PRODUCTIONEconomic Inquiry, 1983
- Pensions and Wages: A Test for Equalizing DifferencesReview of Economics and Statistics, 1980
- Equalizing Differences in the Labor MarketThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1980