The slings and arrows of communication on nanotechnology
Authors:
Open Access
- 20 May 2009
- journal article
- perspectives
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Nanoparticle Research
- Vol. 11 (7) , 1555-1571
Abstract
According to numerous surveys the perceived risk of nanotechnology is low and most people feel that the benefits outweigh the risks. This article provides greater insight into risk perception and concludes that the positive attitude to nanotechnology is based not on knowledge but on hope and fascination. The perceived risk is low because of a lack of vivid and frightening images of possible hazards. If news flashes were to link nanotechnology to concrete hazards or actual harm to people, attitudes might suddenly change. Risk communication faces the problem of dealing with a public at large that has little or no knowledge about the technology. As it takes time and extensive additional research to develop appropriate communication strategies and disseminate them to the relevant institutions, this exercise should be started immediately.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnologyPublic Understanding of Science, 2008
- Laypeople's and Experts' Perception of Nanotechnology HazardsRisk Analysis, 2007
- Public perceptions about nanotechnology: Risks, benefits and trustJournal of Nanoparticle Research, 2004
- MUT — Programmgruppe Mensch, Umwelt, TechnikUmweltwissenschaften und Schadstoff-Forschung, 2001
- The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene TechnologyRisk Analysis, 2000
- A Psychological Study of the Inverse Relationship Between Perceived Risk and Perceived BenefitRisk Analysis, 1994
- Perceived Risk, Trust, and DemocracyRisk Analysis, 1993
- Trust as a Determinant of Opposition to a High‐Level Radioactive Waste Repository: Analysis of a Structural ModelRisk Analysis, 1992
- Credibility and trust in risk communication1991
- Relative importance of scenario information and frequency information in the judgment of riskActa Psychologica, 1989