Covid-19 and recalibration of FDI regimes: convergence or divergence?
Author:
Open Access
- 4 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Transnational Corporations Review
- Vol. 13 (1) , 62-73
Abstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has affected every aspect of business and society including foreign direct investment (FDI) activities. According to an UNCTAD estimate, global FDI flows may fall by 40% in 2020–21. The fall will be more severe in developing countries. Looming large are fears of disruption to supply chains, deceleration of international trade, and concerns over likely takeovers by large multinational corporations (MNCs) and state-owned enterprises to take advantage of the weakened economic situation of companies in many countries. Consequently, the governments of many countries have revised guidelines for FDI screening (e.g. Australia, Canada, France, India, Italy, and Spain) so as to protect companies and critical assets that are of strategic importance such as security, medical products, and protective equipment. This article examines the nature and extent of these changes to determine whether there is convergence or divergence in their responses. The findings provide some support to the convergence hypothesis.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- COVID-19 and International Business: A ViewpointFIIB Business Review, 2020
- World health status 1950-2015: Converging or divergingPLOS ONE, 2019
- Methodological pluralism in international comparative researchInternational Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2014
- Sigma Convergence versus Beta Convergence: Evidence from U.S. County‐Level DataJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2008
- β and σ-convergence: A mathematical relation of causalityEconomics Letters, 2005
- Catching Up, Forging Ahead, and Falling BehindThe Journal of Economic History, 1986
- Comparative Industrial Sociology and the Convergence HypothesisAnnual Review of Sociology, 1979