Comparison of short‐ and long‐term outcomes of diode laser vs. crystallized phenol treatment for pilonidal sinus disease: A propensity score‐matched multicentre study
Authors:
- İsMail Ahmet BilginIBİsMail Ahmet Bilgin
- Nur RamogluNRNur Ramoglu
- Onur SaylıkOSOnur Saylık
- Cigdem BenliceCBCigdem Benlice
- Metincan ErkayaMEMetincan Erkaya
- İnCi KurtulIKİnCi Kurtul
- Afag AghayevaAAAfag Aghayeva
- Ersin TuranETErsin Turan
- Abdullah Sami MadenAMAbdullah Sami Maden
- Fahrettin AcarFAFahrettin Acar
- Tayfun KarahasanogluTKTayfun Karahasanoglu
- İsMail HamzaogluIHİsMail Hamzaoglu
- 28 October 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Colorectal Disease
- Vol. 27 (11) , e70282
Abstract
Aim: Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) primarily affects young adults; rapid recovery is essential and yet lacks a standardized treatment approach. While excisional techniques delay recovery, minimally invasive options like laser ablation and phenol application are gaining interest, yet comparative long‐term evidence is scarce. This study compared short‐ and long‐term outcomes of laser versus phenol treatment in PSD. Method: In this multicentre retrospective cohort study (Nov. 2017–Sep. 2024), patients treated with laser or phenol were included. 1:3 propensity score matching using the nearest neighbour algorithm was performed based on age, gender, prior surgical history and year of operation. Categorical variables were analysed using chi‐squared or Fisher's exact tests, whereas continuous variables were compared using Student's t ‐test or Mann–Whitney U test depending on distribution normality. Results: Out of 897 eligible patients, 644 were included (median age: 26 years, body mass index [BMI]: 26.2 kg/m 2 , male‐to‐female ratio: 4:1). The number of sinuses/pits was 2–3 in both groups. Operating time was significantly longer in the laser group. Complications occurred in 6.8% of laser patients, whereas none were reported in the phenol group. Pain scores were higher in the laser group (2 [1–3] vs. 1 [0–2]). Median follow‐up was 45 months (laser) and 40 months (phenol). Return to daily activities was delayed in the laser group, whereas complete healing was slower in the phenol group. Readmission, recurrence and recovery rates were comparable (85%–86%). Conclusion: Both treatments demonstrated low complication and recurrence rates with high recovery rates. Laser favoured faster healing and fewer sessions, whereas phenol allowed for shorter procedures and earlier return to daily life.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dutch national guideline on the management of intergluteal pilonidal sinus diseaseBritish Journal of Surgery, 2024
- European Society of Coloproctology guidelines for the management of pilonidal diseaseBritish Journal of Surgery, 2024
- Real-world practice and outcomes in pilonidal surgery: Pilonidal Sinus Treatment Studying The Options (PITSTOP) cohortBritish Journal of Surgery, 2024
- Management of Pilonidal DiseaseJAMA Surgery, 2023
- A meta-analysis comparing phenol treatment with surgical excision for pilonidal sinusAsian Journal of Surgery, 2023
- A Retrospective Study of the Safety and Efficacy of a Radial Diode Laser Probe in the Management of Pilonidal Sinus DiseaseDermatologic Surgery, 2021
- Long-term outcomes of crystallized phenol application for the treatment of pilonidal sinus diseaseJournal of Dermatological Treatment, 2020
- The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons’ Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pilonidal DiseaseDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2019
- A new minimally invasive treatment of pilonidal sinus disease with the use of a diode laser: a prospective large series of patientsColorectal Disease, 2018
- Studies Comparing Numerical Rating Scales, Verbal Rating Scales, and Visual Analogue Scales for Assessment of Pain Intensity in Adults: A Systematic Literature ReviewJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2011