Corrosion Testing of Anodized Aerospace Alloys: Comparison Between Immersion and Salt Spray Testing using Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy
Authors:
Open Access
- 3 January 2020
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Electrochemical Society in Journal of the Electrochemical Society
- Vol. 167 (4) , 041505
Abstract
The corrosion performance provided by two anodizing treatments aiming at obtaining films with comparable thickness but different pore morphology was evaluated by immersion, salt spray, and a hybrid tests. The hybrid test was performed in cycles by alternating between immersion and salt spray tests. The corrosion progression was evaluated at selected times by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). The EIS indicated that, during immersion test, the self-sealing of the pores due to the precipitation of aluminium hydroxide was favored, and it provided a substantial contribution to the improved corrosion resistance. Vice versa, during salt spray testing, the continuous flow of electrolyte promoted aluminium oxide film dissolution. The EIS study was complemented by the surface appearance and composition of specimens before and after exposure using Field Emission-Scanning Electron Microscopy (FE-SEM) and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis. Overall, the relative performance of the anodic oxides was shown to be dependent on the exposure conditions. In fact, an anodic film with finer pores behaved better during immersion tests, whereas films with coarser pores provided better corrosion protection during salt spray testing.Keywords
This publication has 32 references indexed in Scilit:
- Self-healing mechanisms in smart protective coatings: A reviewCorrosion Science, 2018
- Morphology perspective on chromic acid anodizing replacement by thin film sulfuric acid anodizingSurface and Coatings Technology, 2018
- Effect of new sealing treatments on corrosion fatigue lifetime of anodized 2024 aluminium alloySurface and Coatings Technology, 2016
- Cerium-Based Sealing of Anodic Films on AA2024T3: Effect of Pore Morphology on Anticorrosion PerformanceJournal of the Electrochemical Society, 2016
- Corrosion protection of clad 2024 aluminum alloy anodized in tartaric-sulfuric acid bath and protected with hybrid sol–gel coatingElectrochimica Acta, 2014
- Reducing the energy cost of protective anodizingJournal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2011
- Role of Tartaric Acid on the Anodizing and Corrosion Behavior of AA 2024 T3 Aluminum AlloyJournal of the Electrochemical Society, 2009
- FESEM and EIS Study of Sealed AA2024 T3 Anodized in Sulfuric Acid Electrolytes: Influence of Tartaric AcidJournal of the Electrochemical Society, 2008
- Evaluation of pore diameter of anodic porous films formed on aluminumSurface and Coatings Technology, 2003
- Sealing of anodic films obtained in oxalic acid bathsSurface and Coatings Technology, 2000