Cancer-Specific Health Utilities: Evaluation of Core Measurement Properties of the EORTC QLU-C10D in Lung Cancer Patients—Data from Four Multicentre LUX-Lung Trials, Applying Six Country Tariffs
Authors:
- Eva Maria GamperEGEva Maria Gamper
- the EORTC Quality of Life GroupTGthe EORTC Quality of Life Group
Open Access
- 2 May 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in PharmacoEconomics - Open
- Vol. 8 (4) , 627-640
Abstract
Background Cost-utility analysis generally requires valid preference-based measures (PBMs) to assess the utility of patient health. While generic PBMs are widely used, disease-specific PBMs may capture additional aspects of health relevant for certain patient populations. This study investigates the construct and concurrent criterion validity of the cancer-specific European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Utility-Core 10 dimensions (QLU-C10D) in non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Methods We retrospectively analysed data from four multicentre LUX-Lung trials, all of which had administered the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the EQ-5D-3L. We applied six country-specific value sets (Australia, Canada, Italy, the Netherlands, Poland, and the United Kingdom) to both instruments. Criterion validity was assessed via correlations between the instruments’ utility scores. Correlations of divergent and convergent domains and Bland-Altman plots investigated construct validity. Floor and ceiling effects were assessed. Results The comparison of the EORTC QLU-C10D and EQ-5D-3L produced homogenous results for five of the six country tariffs. High correlations of utilities (r > 0.7) were found for all country tariffs except for the Netherlands. Moderate to high correlations of converging domain pairs (r from 0.472 to 0.718) were found with few exceptions, such as the Social Functioning–Usual Activities domain pair (max. r = 0.376). For all but the Dutch tariff, the EORTC QLU-C10D produced consistently lower utility values compared to the EQ-5D-3L (x̄ difference from − 0.082 to 0.033). Floor and ceiling effects were consistently lower for the EORTC QLU-C10D (max. 4.67% for utilities). Conclusions The six country tariffs showed good psychometric properties for the EORTC QLU-C10D in lung cancer patients. Criterion and construct validity was established. The QLU-C10D showed superior measurement precision towards the upper and lower end of the scale compared to the EQ-5D-3L, which is important when cost-utility analysis seeks to measure health change across the severity spectrum.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (#12/2016)
This publication has 77 references indexed in Scilit:
- The EORTC QLU-C10D is a valid cancer-specific preference-based measure for cost-utility and health technology assessment in the NetherlandsThe European Journal of Health Economics, 2024
- Content comparison of the EORTC CAT Core, SF‐36, FACT‐G, and PROMIS role and social functioning measures based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthPsycho-Oncology, 2023
- Comparison of EQ-5D-5L and EORTC QLU-C10D utilities in gastric cancer patientsThe European Journal of Health Economics, 2022
- U.K. utility weights for the EORTC QLU‐C10DHealth Economics, 2019
- Patient-Reported Outcomes in Health Economic Decision-Making: A Changing Landscape in Oncology2018
- Economic burden of patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): the LIFE studyJournal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2017
- Epidemiology of Lung Cancer2015
- Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)Quality of Life Research, 2011
- Comparing translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using differential item functioning analysesQuality of Life Research, 2006
- The Dutch tariff: results and arguments for an effective design for national EQ‐5D valuation studiesHealth Economics, 2006