Back to the future: Apis versus non-Apis pollination—a response to Ollerton et al.
Authors:
- Alexandre AebiAAAlexandre Aebi
- Bernard E. VaissièreBVBernard E. Vaissière
- Dennis VanengelsdorpDVDennis Vanengelsdorp
- Keith S. DelaplaneKDKeith S. Delaplane
- David W. RoubikDRDavid W. Roubik
- Peter NeumannPNPeter Neumann
- 1 March 2012
- journal article
- other
- Published by Elsevier in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
- Vol. 27 (3) , 142-143
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Overplaying the role of honey bees as pollinators: a comment on Aebi and Neumann (2011)Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2012
- Endosymbionts and honey bee colony losses?Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2011
- Pollination services in the UK: How important are honeybees?Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2011
- Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble beesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011
- A Tale of Two Bees: Looking at Pollination Fees for Almonds and Sweet CherriesAmerican Entomologist, 2010
- Alternative pollinator taxa are equally efficient but not as effective as the honeybee in a mass flowering cropJournal of Applied Ecology, 2009
- Invasive Africanized honey bee impact on native solitary bees: a pollen resource and trap nest analysisBiological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009
- Decline and Conservation of Bumble BeesAnnual Review of Entomology, 2008
- Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world cropsProceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2006
- Honeybees foreverTrends in Ecology & Evolution, 1991