Moderator Placement in Survey Experiments: Racial Resentment and the “Welfare” versus “Assistance to the Poor” Question Wording Experiment
Authors:
Open Access
- 18 August 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Experimental Political Science
- Vol. 10 (3) , 448-454
Abstract
Researchers face difficult decisions about whether to ask potential moderators before or after a survey experiment. Competing concerns exist about priming respondents before the experiment and about introducing post-treatment bias. We replicate the classic “welfare” versus “assistance to the poor” survey experiment, randomly assigning respondents to be asked a battery of racial resentment questions either before or after the question wording experiment. We find little evidence that the question wording effect is different between those who are asked about racial resentment before versus after the experiment. Furthermore, we find little evidence that measured racial resentment is affected by this ordering or by the question wording treatment itself.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Studying Identities with Experiments: Weighing the Risk of Posttreatment Bias Against Priming EffectsJournal of Experimental Political Science, 2019
- How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about ItAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2018
- Assessing the Programmatic Equivalence Assumption in Question Wording ExperimentsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2013
- When Do Welfare Attitudes Become Racialized? The Paradoxical Effects of EducationAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2004
- The Effect of Question Wording on Public Support for Government SpendingPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1989
- That Which We Call Welfare by Any Other Name Would Smell Sweeter an Analysis of the Impact of Question Wording on Response PatternsPublic Opinion Quarterly, 1987