Surgeon Variation in Intraoperative Supply Cost for Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Is Intraoperative Supply Cost Associated with Outcomes?
- 19 October 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 226 (1) , 37-45e1
Abstract
With increased scrutiny on the quality and cost of health care, surgeons must be mindful of their outcomes and resource use. We evaluated surgeon-specific intraoperative supply cost (ISC) for pancreaticoduodenectomy and examined whether ISC was associated with patient outcomes. Patients undergoing open pancreaticoduodenectomy between January 2012 and March 2015 were included. Outcomes were tracked prospectively through postoperative day 90, and ISC was defined as the facility cost of single-use surgical items and instruments, plus facility charges for multiuse equipment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to test associations between ISC and patient outcomes using repeated measures at the surgeon level. There were 249 patients who met inclusion criteria. Median ISC was $1,882 (interquartile range [IQR] $1,497 to $2,281). Case volume for 6 surgeons ranged from 18 to 66. Median surgeon-specific ISC ranged from $1,496 to $2,371. Greater case volume was associated with decreased ISC (p < 0.001). Overall, ISC was not predictive of postoperative complications (p = 0.702) or total hospitalization expenditures (p = 0.195). At the surgeon level, surgeon-specific ISC was not associated with the surgeon-specific incidence of severe complication or any wound infection (p > 0.227 for both), but was associated with delayed gastric emptying (p = 0.004) and postoperative pancreatic fistula (p < 0.001). In a single-institution cohort of 249 pancreaticoduodenectomies, high-volume surgeons tended to be low-cost surgeons. Across the cohort, ISC was not associated with outcomes. At the surgeon level, associations were noted between ISC and complications, but these may be attributable to unmeasured differences in the postoperative management of patients. These findings suggest that quality improvement efforts to restructure resource use toward more cost-effective practice may not affect patient outcomes, although prospective monitoring of safety and effectiveness must be of the utmost concern.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Standardization of Disposable Instruments in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: A Case Study in Cost ReductionJournal of Reconstructive Microsurgery, 2016
- Variation in Hospital Episode Costs With Bariatric SurgeryJAMA Surgery, 2015
- Educating Surgeons May Allow for Reduced Intraoperative Costs for Inguinal HerniorrhaphyJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2015
- Readmission After Pancreaticoduodenectomy: The Influence of the Volume Effect Beyond MortalityAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2015
- Educating surgeons on intraoperative disposable supply costs during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a regional health system's experienceThe American Journal of Surgery, 2015
- Cost effectiveness after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: bolstering the volume argumentHPB, 2014
- Standardization of operative equipment reduces costJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 2013
- Postoperative Morbidity Index: A Quantitative Measure of Severity of Postoperative ComplicationsJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2011
- Medicare Payments for Common Inpatient Procedures: Implications for Episode‐Based Payment BundlingHealth Services Research, 2010
- Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy determines length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortalityJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2001