Systematic Review: Efficacy and Safety of Accelerated Induction Regimes in Infliximab Rescue Therapy for Hospitalized Patients with Acute Severe Colitis
- 7 December 2018
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Digestive Diseases and Sciences
- Vol. 64 (5) , 1119-1128
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Infliximab versus ciclosporin for steroid-resistant acute severe ulcerative colitis (CONSTRUCT): a mixed methods, open-label, pragmatic randomised trialThe Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 2016
- Pharmacokinetic Features and Presence of Antidrug Antibodies Associate With Response to Infliximab Induction Therapy in Patients With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative ColitisClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2016
- Pushing the Pedal to the Metal: Should We Accelerate Infliximab Therapy for Patients With Severe Ulcerative Colitis?Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2015
- An Accelerated Infliximab Induction Regimen Reduces the Need for Early Colectomy in Patients With Acute Severe Ulcerative ColitisClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2015
- Ciclosporin versus infliximab in patients with severe ulcerative colitis refractory to intravenous steroids: a parallel, open-label randomised controlled trialThe Lancet, 2012
- A Nationwide Analysis of Changes in Severity and Outcomes of Inflammatory Bowel Disease HospitalizationsJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2011
- Population pharmacokinetic analysis of infliximab in patients with ulcerative colitisEuropean Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2009
- Response to Corticosteroids in Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review of the Literature and a Meta-RegressionClinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2007
- Infliximab as Rescue Therapy in Severe to Moderately Severe Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled StudyGastroenterology, 2005
- Randomized, double-blind comparison of 4 mg/kg versus 2 mg/kg intravenous cyclosporine in severe ulcerative colitis1 1Gert Van Assche, Severine Vermeire, Geert D’Haens, and Paul Rutgeerts have been instrumental in the design of the study, trial management, data analysis, and writing the paper. Maja Noman had a major contribution in the clinical ambulatory follow-up of the patients in the trial. Martin Hiele followed cyclosporine levels and adjusted drug doses of patients in the trial and provided statistical advice. Katrien Asnong was the study coordinator and had a major share in data analysis. Joris Arts analyzed safety data and followed patients clinically during the trial. Andre D’Hoore and Freddy Penninckx performed the surgical interventions in patients failing the trial and substantially contributed in evaluating patients for colectomy.Gastroenterology, 2003