To Which World Regions Does the Valence-Dominance Model of Social Perception Apply?
Authors:
- Benedict C JonesBJBenedict C Jones
- Lisa Marie DeBruineLDLisa Marie DeBruine
- Jessica Kay FlakeJFJessica Kay Flake
- Marco Tullio LiuzzaMLMarco Tullio Liuzza
- Jan AntfolkJAJan Antfolk
- Nwadiogo Chisom ArinzeNANwadiogo Chisom Arinze
- Izuchukwu Lawrence Gabriel NdukaiheINIzuchukwu Lawrence Gabriel Ndukaihe
- Nicholas BloxsomNBNicholas Bloxsom
- Savannah C LewisSLSavannah C Lewis
- Francesco ForoniFFFrancesco Foroni
- Megan WillisMWMegan Willis
- Carmelo P. CubillasCCCarmelo P. Cubillas
Preprint
- 18 May 2018
- preprint
- Published by Center for Open Science in PsyArXiv
Abstract
Over the past 10 years, Oosterhof and Todorov’s valence–dominance model has emerged as the most prominent account of how people evaluate faces on social dimensions. In this model, two dimensions (valence and dominance) underpin social judgements of faces. Because this model has primarily been developed and tested in Western regions, it is unclear whether these findings apply to other regions. We addressed this question by replicating Oosterhof and Todorov’s methodology across 11 world regions, 41 countries and 11,570 participants. When we used Oosterhof and Todorov’s original analysis strategy, the valence–dominance model generalized across regions. When we used an alternative methodology to allow for correlated dimensions, we observed much less generalization. Collectively, these results suggest that, while the valence–dominance model generalizes very well across regions when dimensions are forced to be orthogonal, regional differences are revealed when we use different extraction methods and correlate and rotate the dimension reduction solution.Keywords
All Related Versions
- Version 1, 2018-05-18, PsyArXiv
- Published version: Nature Human Behaviour, 5 (1), 159.